Site Search | Site Index

Updated Dec. 28, 2004

This list is organized by subject and then by date, with the most recent articles listed first under each heading. Contact cnyberg @ u.washington.edu to suggest additional entries.

Admiralty & Maritime

• Jessica Romero, "Prevention of Maritime Terrorism:  The Container Security Initiative," 4 Chicago Journal of International Law 597-605 (2003).
• Peter Rogan, "Insuring the Risk of Terrorist Damage and Other Hostile Deliberate Damage to Property Involved in the Marine Adventure: An English Law Perspective," 77 Tulane Law Review 1295-1331 (2003).
• Thomas J. Schoenbaum & Jessica C. Langstonm "An All Hands Evolution: Port Security in the Wake of September 11^th," 77 Tulane Law Review 1333-70 (2003).
• Robert G. Clyne, "Terrorism and Port/Cargo Security: Developments and Implications for Marine Cargo Recoveries." 77 Tulane Law Review 1183-1222 (2003).
• Douglas B. Stevenson, "The Burden That 9/11 Imposed on Seafarers," 77 Tulane Law Review 1407-28 (2003).

Airline Industry & Travel

• Michael J. DeGrave, "Airline Passenger Profiling and the Fourth Amendment: Will CAPPS II Be Cleared for Takeoff?" 10 Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law 125-51 (2004).
• Larry Moore, "The World Trade Center--Terrorist Airline Destruction: Will This Be the First Test of the War Between the Montreal Liability Convention's Article 21(2)(a) and 21(2)(b)?" 68 Journal of Air Law & Commerce 699-715 (2003).
• Erwin E. Caban, "War-Risk, Hijacking & Terrorism Exclusions in Aviation Insurance: Carrier Liability in the Wake of September 11, 2001," 68 Journal of Air Law & Commerce 421-48 (2003).
• Kent C. Krause, "Putting the Transportation Security Administration in Historical Context," 68 Journal of Air Law & Commerce 233-51 (2003).
• Raymond L. Mariani, "Industry in Crisis: A Progress Report on Victim Compensation and the Airlines After the September 11th Legislation,"  68 Journal of Air Law & Commerce 258-82 (2003).
• Elton Ueoka Dodson, "Access to the Airways after September 11: Do Aviation Businesses Devastated by the Restrictions Have a Fifth Amendment Remedy?" 30 Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 173-95 (2002).
• Margaret M. Blair, "The Economics of Post-September 11 Financial Aid to Airlines," 36 Indiana Law Review 367-95 (2003).
• Carl E. Fumarola, "Stratospheric Recovery: Recent and Forthcoming Changes in International Air and Disaster Law and Its Effect on Air Terrorism Recovery," 36 Suffolk University Law Review 821-42 (2003).
• Stephen M. Shrewsbury, "September 11th and the Single European Sky: Developing Concepts of Airspace Sovereignty," 68 Journal of Air Law & Commerce 115-60 (2003).
• Dave Hunter, "Common Scents: Establishing a Presumption of Reliability for Detector Dog Teams Used in Airports in Light of the Current Terrorist Threats," 28 University of Dayton Law Review 89-109 (2002).
• Molly Selzer, "Federalization of Airport Security Workers: A Study of the Practical Impact of the Aviation and Transportation Security Act from a Labor Law Perspective," 5 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor & Employment Law 363-81 (2003).
• Anthony J. Broderick & James Loos, "Government Aviation Safety Oversight-Trust, But Verify," 67 Journal of Air Law & Commerce 1035-56 (2002).
• Speedy Rice & Shana Fitzpatrick, "Terrorism and the Aviation Industry: Insights from the 1929 Warsaw Convention," 78 North Dakota Law Review 713-39 (2002).
• Ellen Baker, "Flying While Arab-Racial Profiling and Air Travel Security," 67 Journal of Air Law & Commerce 1375-1405 (2002).
• Justin S.C. Mellor, "Missing the Boat: The Legal and Practical Problems of the Prevention of Maritime Terrorism," 18 American University International Law Review 341-97 (2002).
• Andrew Hessick, "The Federalization of Airport Security: Privacy Implications," 24 Whittier Law Review 43-69 (2002).
• Greg Star, "Airport Security Technology: Is the Use of Biometric Identification Technology Valid under the Fourth Amendment?" 20 Temple Environmental Law & Technology Journal 251-65 (2002).
• Michael Whitaker, "Competition in the Airline Industry after September 11, 2001,"14 DePaul Business Law Journal 319-32 (2002).
• Frank Costello, "The New Federal Approach to Transportation: The First Three Months of the Transportation Security Act and the Transportation Security Administration," 14 DePaul Business Law Journal 333-40 (2002).
• Mary Schiavo, "Flying Right: What It Takes to Make Aviation Safer and More Secure after 2001," 14 DePaul Business Law Journal 279-301 (2002).
• Jack H. Daniel, III, "Reform in Airport Security: Panic or Precaution?" 53 Mercer Law Review 1623-46 (2002).
• Richard P. Campbell, "America Acts: Swift Legislative Responses to the September 11th Attacks; Congress Moved to Stabilize the Airline Industry, to Establish a Victim Compensation Fund, and to Strengthen Airport and Aircraft Security," 69 Defense Counsel Journal 139 (2002).
• Phillip A. Karber, "Re-constructing Global Aviation in an Era of the `Civil Aircraft as a Weapon of Destruction'," 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 781-814 (2002).
• Brett Andrew Skean, "The Fourth Amendment and the New Face of Terrorism: How September 11th Could Change the Way America Flies," 22 Northern Illinois University Law Review 567-88 (2002).

top

Banking & Finance

• Joan M. O'Sullivan-Butler, "Combatting Money Laundering and International Terrorism: Does the USA PATRIOT Act Require the Judicial System to Abandon Fundamental Due Process in the Name of Homeland Security?" 16 St. Thomas Law Review 395-422 (2004).
• Cynthia J. Larose, "International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti- Terrorism Financing Act of 2001," 30 Journal of College and University Law 417-33 (2004).
• Walter Perkel, "Money Laundering and Terrorism: Informal Value Transfer Systems," 41 American Criminal Law Review 183-211 (2004).
• Kevin L. Shepherd, "The USA PATRIOT Act: The Complexities of Imposing Anti-Money Laundering Obligations on the Real Estate Industry," 39 Real Property Probate & Trust Journal 403-38 (2004).
• Amy Walters, "The Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering: The World Strikes Back on Terrorist Financing," 9 Law & Business Review of the Americas 167-80 (2003).
• Eric J. Gouvin, "Bringing Out the Big Guns: The USA PATRIOT Act, Money Laundering, and the War on Terrorism," 55 Baylor Law Review 955-90 (2003).
• Amy Walters, "The Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering: The World Strikes Back on Terrorist Financing," 9 Law & Business Review of the Americas 167-80 (2003).
• Kellie. McGowan, "Following the Money Trail: Can American Lawyers Use American and International Discovery Procedures to Prove the Link Between International Terrorist Acts and Financiers?" 18 Temple International & Comparative Law Journal 175-98 (2004).
• Alicia L. Rause, "USA Patriot Act: Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Legislation in the U.S. and Europe since September 11^th," 11 International & Comparative Law Review 173-86 (2003).
• Angela D. Hardister, "Can We Buy Peace on Earth?: The Price of Freezing Terrorist Assets in a Post-September 11 World," 28 North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 605-61 (2003).
• Kathryn Lee Holloman, "The New Identity Crises: USA PATRIOT Act Customer Identification Programs and the Matricula Consular as Primary Identity Verification for Mexican Nationals," 7 North Carolina Banking Institute 125-54 (2003).
• Organized Crime, Terrorism, and Money Laundering in the Americas. Introduction by Fletcher N. Baldwin, Jr., articles by Alan Lambert, George H. Millard & Peter M. German. 15 Florida Journal of International Law 3-37 (2002).
• Nicole M. Healy, "The Impact of September 11th on Anti-Money Laundering Efforts, and the European Union and Commonwealth Gatekeeper Initiatives," 36 International Lawyer 733-49 (2002).
• Rudolph Lehrer, "Unbalancing the Terrorists' Checkbook: Analysis of U.S. Policy in Its Economic War on International Terrorism," 10 Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law 333-60 (2002).
• Joseph J. Norton & Heba Shams, "Money Laundering Law and Terrorist Financing: Post-September 11 Responses--Let Us Step Back and Take a Deep Breath," 36 International Lawyer 103-24 (2002).
• Andrews Ayers, "The Financial Action Task Force: The War on Terrorism Will Not Be Fought on the Battlefield," 18 New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 449-59 (2002).
• Thomas P. Vartanian, Mark J. Dorsey & Christopher M. Salter, "Information Sharing under the USA PATRIOT Act," 119 Banking Law Journal 600-607 (2002).
• Paul Schott Stevens & Thomas C. Bogle, "Patriotic Acts: Financial Institutions, Money Laundering and the War Against Terrorism," 21 Annual Review of Banking Law 261-90 (2002).
• Mark Kantor, "The War on Terrorism and the End of Banking Neutrality," 118 Banking Law Journal 891 (2001).

top

Bioterrorism

• Ronnie Lippens, "Viral Contagion and Anti-Terrorism: Notes on Medical Emergency, Legality and Diplomacy," 17 International Journal for Semiotics Law 125-39 (2004).
• Lori L. Buchsbaum, "The U.S. Public Health Response to Bioterrorism: Need for a Stronger Legislative Approach," 7 Journal of Medicine and Law 1-36 (2002).
• Robert Eisig Bienstock, "Anti-bioterrorism Research Post-9/11 Legislation: The USA PATRIOT Act and Beyond," 30 Journal of College & University Law 465-92 (2004).
• Rima Laham, "Bioterrorism and the MSEHPA," 4 Houston Journal of Health Law & Policy 117-47 (2003).
• David P. Fidler, "Public Health and National Security in the Global Age: Infectious Diseases, Bioterrorism, and Realpolitik," 35 George Washington International Law Review 787-856 (2003).
• George J. Annas, "Puppy Love: Bioterrorism, Civil Rights, and Public Health," 55 Florida Law Review 1171-90 (2003).
• Dunwody Distinguished Lecture in Law: When Terrorism Threatens Health: How Far are Limitations on Personal and Economic Liberties Justified? Article by Lawrence O. Gostin; commentaries by George J. Annas, James F. Childress, Ruth Gaare Bernheim, Wendy E. Parmet and Bruce Jennings. 55 Florida Law Review 1105-1256 (2003).
• Lawrence O. Gostin, "The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: Public Health and Civil Liberties in a Time of Terrorism," 13 Health Matrix 3-32 (2003).
• George J. Annas, "Blinded by Bioterrorism: Public Health and Liberty in the 21st Century," 13 Health Matrix 33-70 (2003).
• Wendy E. Parmet, "Quarantine Redux: Bioterrorism, AIDS and the Curtailment of Individual Liberty in the Name of Public Health," 13 Health Matrix 85-115 (2003).
• Victoria Sutton, "Biodefense: Who's in Charge?" 13 Health Matrix 117-58 (2003).
• Barry Kellman, "Regulation of Biological Research in the Terrorism Era," 13 Health Matrix 159-80 (2003).
• Kenny Mallow Williamson, "Proving Causation in Acts of Bioterrorism," 33 Cumberland Law Review 709-26 (2002-2003).
• Timothy K. Gilman, "Search, Sentence, and (Don't) Sell: Combating the Threat of Biological Weapons Through Inspections, Criminalization, and Restrictions on Equipment." 12 Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 217252 (2003).
• Jason W. Sapsin, "Introduction to Emergency Public Health Law for Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response," 9 Widener Law Symposium Journal 387-400 (2003).
• Ross D. Silverman & Thomas May, "Terror and Triage: Prioritizing Access to Mass Smallpox Vaccination," 36 Creighton Law Review 359-74 (2003).
• Arnoldo Lacayo, "Seeking a Balance: International Pharmaceutical Patent Protection, Public Health Crises, and the Emerging Threat of Bio-Terrorism," 33 University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 295-321 (2002).
• Edward P. Richards, Terry O'Brien & Katharine C. Rathbun, "Bioterrorism and the Use of Fear in Public Health," 34 Urban Lawyer 685-726 (2002).
• Paul E. Pepe & Kathy J. Rinnert, "Bioterrorism and Medical Risk Management," 36 International Lawyer 9-20 (2002).
• Victoria V. Sutton, "Precarious Hot Zone: The President's Plan to Combat Bioterrorism," 164 Military Law Review 135 (2000).
• Francine M. Guesnier, "World Trade Center Attacks: Fears of Biological Warfare Stand in the Wake," 2001 Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy 181-90.
• Wendy E. Parmet, "After September 11: Rethinking Public Health Federalism," 30 Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 201 (2002).
• Barry Kellman, "An International Criminal Law Approach to Bioterrorism," 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 721-42 (2002).
• Patricia G. Hinegardner & Alexa Mayo, "Selected Bioterrorism Web Sites for the Health Care Community and Consumer," Internet Reference Services Quarterly Vol. 6, nos. 3/4, 2002, at 1.
• Edwin A. Holtum & Linda K. Roth, "Anthrax Resources on the Web," "Information for Immunity: Internet Resources on Biological Agents as Terrorist Weapons," Internet Reference Services Quarterly Vol. 6, nos. 3/4, 2002, at 17.
• Garry J. Forger & Janet A. Knight, "Information for Immunity: Internet Resources on Biological Agents as Terrorist Weapons," Internet Reference Services Quarterly Vol. 6, nos. 3/4, 2002, at 33.
• David P. Fidler, "Bioterrorism, Public Health, and International Law," 3 Chicago Journal of International Law 7-26 (2002).
• James G. Hodge, Jr., "Bioterrorism Law and Policy: Critical Choices in Public Health," 30 Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 254-61 (2002).

top

Constitutional Issues

• Shawn Boyne, "Law, Terrorism, and Social Movements: The Tensions between Politics and Security in Germany's Anti-Terrorism Legislation," 12 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 41-82 (2004).
• Kelly R. Cusick, "Thwarting Ideological Terrorism: Are We Brave Enough to Maintain Civil Liberties in the Face of Terrorist Induced Trauma?" 35 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 55-88 (2003).
• Celia M. Rumann, "Tortured History: Finding Our Way Back to the Lost Origins of the Eighth Amendment," 31 Pepperdine Law Review 661 (2004).(analysis of the Framers' intent in adopting the Eighth Amendment and concluding it was designed, in part, to prevent torturous interrogation; applying this analysis to case of Jose Padilla)
• Christopher E. Smith, "The Bill of Rights after September 11th: Principles or Pragmatism?" 42 Duquesne Law Review 259-91 (2004).
• Roberto.Iraola, "Enemy Combatants, the Courts, and the Constitution," 56 Oklahoma Law Review 565-621 (2003).
• Christopher J. Schmidt, "Could a CIA or FBI Agent Be Quartered in Your House During a War on Terrorism, Iraq, or North Korea?", 48 St. Louis University Law Journal 587 (2004).
• Rebecca A. Copeland, "War on Terrorism or War on Constitutional Rights? Blurring the Lines of Intelligence Gathering in Post-September 11 America," 35 Texas Tech Law Review 1-31 (2004).
• Michael P. O'Connor & Celia M. Rumann, "Going, Going, Gone: Sealing the Fate of the Fourth Amendment," 26 Fordham International Law Journal 1234 (2003) (analysis of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review's decision, In re Sealed Case, applying PATRIOT Act provisions to FISA).
• Seth F. Kreimer, "Too Close to the Rack and the Screw: Constitutional Constraints on Torture in the War on Terror," 6 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 278-325 (2003).
• Alan M. Dershowitz, "Reply: Torture Without Visibility and Accountability Is Worse Than with It," 6 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 326 (2003).
• Seth F. Kreimer, "Surreply: Constitutional Principles and Collateral Damage," 6 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 327 (2003).
• James P. Fantetti, "John Walker Lindh, Terrorist? Or Merely a Citizen Exercising His Constitutional Freedom: The Limits of the Freedom of Association in the Aftermath of September Eleventh," 71 University of Cincinnati Law Review 1373-95 (2003).
• Melissa  Blair, "Terrorism, America's Porous Borders, and the Role of the Invasion Clause Post-9/11/2001," 87 Marquette Law Review 167-223 (2003).
• Natsu Taylor Saito, "Will Force Trump Legality after September 11? American Jurisprudence Confronts the Rule of Law," 17 Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 1-62 (2002).
• Aubrey Glover, "Terrorism: Aliens' Freedom of Speech and Association under Attack in the United States," 41 Duquesne Law Review 363-89 (2003).
• Heath H. Galloway, "Don't Forget What We're Fighting for: Will the Fourth Amendment Be a Casualty of the War on Terror?" 59 Washington & Lee Law Review 921-74 (2002).
• Roberto Iraola, "Terrorism, the Border, and the Fourth Amendment," 2003 Federal Courts Law Review 1, available at http://www.fclr.org/2003fedctslrev1.htm.
• J. Gregory Sidak, "The Price of Experience: The Constitution after September 11, 2001." 19 Constitutional Commentary 37-61 (2002).
• Floyd Abrams, "The First Amendment and the War Against Terrorism," 5 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 1-11 (2002).
• John W. Whitehead & Steven H. Aden, "Forfeiting `Enduring Freedom' for `Homeland Security': A Constitutional Analysis of the USA PATRIOT Act and the Justice Department's Anti-Terrorism Initiatives. 51 American University Law Review 1081-1133 (2002).
• M.K.B. Darmer, "Lessons from the Lindh Case: Public Safety and the First Amendment," 68 Brooklyn Law Review 241-87 (2002).
• Whitney D. Frazier, "The Constitutionality of Detainment in the Wake of September 11," 90 Kentucky Law Journal 1089-1124 (2001-2002).
• Rodney A. Smolla, "Terrorism and the Bill of Rights," 10 William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 551-83 (2002).
• Robert J. Delahunty & John C. Yoo, "The President's Constitutional Authority to Conduct Military Operations Against Terrorist Organizations and the Nations That Harbor or Support Them," 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 487-517 (2002).
• Steven J. Bucklin, "To Preserve These Rights: The Constitution and National Emergencies," 47 South Dakota Law Review 85-98 (2002).
• Lori. Sachs, "September 11, 2001: The Constitution During Crisis: A New Perspective," 29 Fordham Urban Law Journal 1715-50 (2002).
• Jay Shapiro, "Terrorism, the Constitution, and the Courts," 18 New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 189-203 (2002).

top

Environment & Energy

• Varu Chilakamarri, "A New Instrument in National Security: The Legislative Attempt to Combat Terrorism via the Safe Drinking Water Act," 91 Georgetown Law Journal 927-48 (2003).
• Christopher Gozdor et al., "Where the Streets Have No Name: The Collision of Environmental Law and Information Policy in the Age of Terrorism," 33 Environmental Law Reporter News & Analysis 10978-10995 (2003).
• Roland M. Frye, Jr., "The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Is Not Required by Statute to Release Terrorism-Related Portions of Environmental Impact Statements," 55 Administrative Law Review 643-77 (2003).
• Michael B. Gerrard, "Disasters First: Rethinking Environmental Law after September 11. 9 Widener Law Symposium Journal 223-35 (2003).
• Rinaldo Campana, "Responding to an Incident Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction--An Overview,". 9 Widener Law Symposium Journal 249-59 (2003).
• James T. O'Reilly, "Planning for the Unthinkable: Environmental Disaster Planning Issues in an Age of Terroristic Threats," 9 Widener Law Symposium Journal 261-93 (2003).
• William C. Nicholson, "Legal Issues in Emergency Response to Terrorism Incidents Involving Hazardous Materials: The Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) Standard, Standard Operating Procedures, Mutual Aid, and the Incident Management System," 9 Widener Law Symposium Journal 295-337 (2003).
• Joseph A. Siegel, "Terrorism and Environmental Law: Chemical Facility Site Security vs. Right-to-Know?" 9 Widener Law Symposium Journal 339-85 (2003).
• James M. Stuhltrager, "Oil Pollution and Environmental Terrorism--An Overview of the Potential Legal Response in the United States," 9 Widener Law Symposium Journal 401-18 (2003).
• Itzchak E. Kornfeld, "Terror in the Water: Threats to Drinking Water and Infrastructure," 9 Widener Law Symposium Journal 439-83 (2003).
• Nancye L. Bethurem, "Environmental Destruction in the Name of National Security: Will the Old Paradigm Return in the Wake of September 11?" 8 Hastings West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law & Policy 109-33 (2002).
• ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources, Natural Resources & the Environment, Vol. 16, No. 3 (Winter 2002) issue on Security: Energy, Environment, and Natural Resources in a Changed World. Contains articles on "Balancing Homeland Security and Freedom of Information," "Coordinating Efforts to Secure American Public Water Supplies," "Energy and Environmental Policy after September 2001," "Ecoterror: Rethinking Environmental Security after September 11," "Nuclear Energy and Terrorism," "EPCRA Emergency Plans: What to Consider Post-September 11," "The Department of Interior's Role in National Emergencies," "The Invisible Hand Will Secure the Electric Grid," "The Future of Chemical and Biological Weapons Conventions," and "Energy Security and Increasing North American Oil and Gas Production." http://www.abanet.org/environ/pubs/nre/specissue/home.html.

top

Freedom of Information

• Keith Anderson, "Is There Still a "Sound Legal Basis?": The Freedom of Information Act in the Post-9/11 World.," 64 Ohio State Law Journal 1605-54 (2003).
• Kristen Elizabeth Uhl, "The Freedom of Information Act Post-9/11: Balancing the Public's Right to Know, Critical Infrastructure Protection, and Homeland Security," 53 American University Law Review 261-311 (2003).

Homeland Security

• Jennifer Van Bergen, "In the Absence of Democracy: The Designational and Material Support Provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Laws," 2 Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal 107-60 (2003).
• "The Red and Green Lights of Homeland Security," 12 U.S.-Mexico Law Journal 89-112 (2004).
• Jamie Lewis Keith, "The War on Terrorism Affects the Academy: Principal Post-September 11, 2001 Federal Anti-Terrorism Statutes, Regulations and Policies That Apply to Colleges and Universities," 30 Journal of College and University Law 239-335 (2004).
• Nancy Tribbensee, "Privacy and Security in Higher Education Computing Environments after the USA PATRIOT Act," 30 Journal of College and University Law 337-61 (2004).
• Lee S. Strickland, Mary Minow & Tomas Lipinski, "Patriot in the Library: Management Approaches When Demands for Information Are Received from Law Enforcement and Intelligence Agents," 30 Journal of College and University Law 363-415 (2004).
• Nicolas J. Perry, "The Numerous Federal Legal Definitions of Terrorism: The Problem of Too Many Grails," 30 Journal of Legislation. 249-74 (2004).
• Kim Lane Scheppele, "Law in a Time of Emergency: States of Exception and the Temptations of 9/11," 6 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 1001-83 (2004).
• Darren W. Stanhouse, "Ambition and Abdication: Congress, the Presidency, and the Evolution of the Department of Homeland Security," 29 North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation 691-711 (2004).
• Jamie Lewis Keith, "The War on Terrorism Affects the Academy: Principal Post-September 11, 2001 Federal Anti-Terrorism Statutes, Regulations and Policies That Apply to Colleges and Universities," 30 Journal of College & University Law 239-335 (2004).
• Lee S. Strickland, Mary Minow & Tomas Lipinski, "Patriot in the Library: Management Approaches When Demands for Information Are Received from Law Enforcement and Intelligence Agents," 30 Journal of College & University Law 363-415 (2004).
• Michael Power, "Security and Freedom--Are the Governments' Efforts to Deal with Terrorism Violative of Our Freedoms?" 29 Canada-U.S. Law Journal 331-37 (2003)
• David D. Cole, "Security and Freedom--Are the Governments' Efforts to Deal with Terrorism Violative of Our Freedoms?" 29 Canada-U.S. Law Journal 339-49 (2003)
• Gabriel Soll, "Terrorism: The Known Element No One Can Define," 11 Willamette Journal of International Law & Dispute Resolution 123-68 (2004).
• Heidee Stoller, Tahlia Townsend, Rashad Hussain & Yablon, "Developments in Law and Policy. The Costs of Post-9/11 National Security Strategy,"  22 Yale Law & Policy Review 197-233 (2004).
• Richard H. Schneider, "American Anti-Terrorism Planning and Design Strategies: Applications for Florida Growth Management, Comprehensive Planning and Urban Design," 15 University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy 129-54 (2003).
• Michael P. O'Connor & Celia M. Rumann, "Into the Fire: How to Avoid Getting Burned by the Same Mistakes Made Fighting Terrorism in Northern Ireland," 24 Cardozo Law Review 1657 (2003). (in depth analysis of British policies of combatting terrorism in N. Ireland, comparing them with methods adopted in the U.S.)
• Joseph I. Liebman, "9-11's Impact on the Practice of Customs Laws," 18 St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary 125-47 (2003).
• Daniel P. Dain & Robert L. Brennan, Jr., "Negligent Security Law in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in the Post-September 11 Era," 38 New England Law Review 73-96 (2003).
• Gary J. Newkirk, "Homeland Security: The Business of Preserving Democracy not Practicing It," 55 Administrative Law Review  823-42 (2003).
• Tracey Topper Gonzalez, "Individual Rights Versus Collective Security: Assessing the Constitutionality of the USA Patriot Act," 11 International & Comparative Law Review 75-113 (2003).
• Natsu Taylor Saito, "Whose Liberty? Whose Security? The USA PATRIOT Act in the Context of COINTELPRO and the Unlawful Repression of Political Dissent," 81 Oregon Law Review 1051-1131 (2002).
• Jonathan Thessin, "Recent Development: Department of Homeland Security," 40 Harvard Journal on Legislation 513-35 (2003).
• Stephen D. Lobaugh, "Congress's Response to September 11: Liberty's Protector," 1 Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 131-50 (2002).
• Mona Conway, "Terrorism, the Law and Politics as Usual: A Comparison of Anti-Terrorism Legislation Before and After 9/11," 18 735-81 (2002).
• Benjamin Langille, "It's "Instant Custom": How the Bush Doctrine Became Law after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001," 26 Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 145-56 (2003).
• Panel Discussion: The USA-PATRIOT Act and the American Response to Terror: Can We Protect Civil Liberties after September 11? Moderator: Jeffrey Toobin; panelists: Congressman Barney Frank, Michael Chertoff, David Cole, Stuart Taylor, Jr. & Beth Wilkinson. 39 American Criminal Law Review 1501-33 (2002).
• Alision A. Bradley, "Extremism in the Defense of Liberty?: The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the Significance of the USA PATRIOT Act," 77 Tulane Law Review 465-93 (2002).
• John Bell, "Comments on the FBI in the Wake of 9/11 and Legal Standards and Procedures for Homeland Investigations," 10 Michigan State University-Detroit College of Law Journal of International Law 552-62 (2001).
• Keith Sealing, "'State Sponsors of Terrorism' Is a Question, Not an Answer: The Terrorism Amendment to the FSIA Makes Less Sense Now Than It Did Before 9/11," 38 Texas International Law Journal 119-44 (2003).
• Aaron J. Noteboom, "Terrorism: I Know It When I See It," 81 Oregon Law Review 553-85 (2002).
• Robert R.M.Verchick, "Foreword: Cities on the Front Line," 34 Urban Lawyer 557-61 (2002).
• Richard Briffault, "Facing the Urban Future after September 11, 2001," 34 Urban Lawyer 563-82 (2002).
• David J. Barron & Gerald E. Frug, "After 9/11: Cities," 34 Urban Lawyer 583-98 (2002).
• Karen Sawislak, "September 11 and New York City: Patterns of Urban Disaster in the United States," 34 Urban Lawyer 599-607 (2002).
• Marc H. Morial, "A `National Action Plan' for American Cities," 34 Urban Lawyer 609-13 (2002).
• U.S. Conference of Mayors, "A National Action Plan for Safety and Security in America's Cities, (December 2001), with a New Preface by Mayor Thomas M. Menino," 34 Urban Lawyer 615-37 (2002).
• William R. Dodge, "Regional Emergency Preparedness Compacts: Safeguarding the Nation's Communities," 34 Urban Lawyer 639-83 (2002).
• Carroll E. Dubuc, "Terrorism: September 11 Transportation and Premises Liability--Trial or Arbitration of Claims," 52 FDCC Quarterly 343-64 (2002).
• Jerry D. Johnson, "Premises Liability Issues for Office Building Owners in a Time of Terrorist Threats," 20 Journal of Taxation of Investments 49-66 (Autumn 2002).
• Leti Volpp, " The Citizen and the Terrorist," 49 UCLA Law Review 1575-1600 (2002).
• Lotte E. Feinberg, "Homeland Security: Implications for Information Policy and Practice--First Appraisal," 19 Government Information Quarterly 265-88 (2002).
• Harold C. Relyea, "Homeland Security and Information," 19 Government Information Quarterly 213-23 (2002).
• Jeffrey W. Seifert, "The Effects of September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attacks on Public and Private Information Infrastructures: A Preliminary Assessment of Lessons Learned," 19 Government Information Quarterly 225-42 (2002).
• L. Elaine Halchin, "Electronic Government in the Age of Terrorism," 19 Government Information Quarterly 243-54 (2002).
• Thomas Cmar, "Recent Development: Office of Homeland Security," 39 Harvard Journal on Legislation 455-74 (2002).
• Andrew E. Taslitz, "Terrorism and the Citizenry's Safety," Criminal Justice, Summer 2002, at 4.
• Frederick P. Hitz, "Unleashing the Rogue Elephant: September 11 and Letting the CIA Be the CIA," 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 765-80 (2002).
• William J. Stuntz, "Terrorism, Federalism, and Police Misconduct," 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 665-79 (2002).
• Eric Posner, "Fear and the Regulatory Model of Counterterrorism. 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 681-97 (2002).
• William E. Lee, "`Security Review' and the First Amendment," 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 721-42 (2002).
• David A. Klinger & Dave Grossman," Who Should Deal with Foreign Terrorists on U.S. Soil?: Socio-legal Consequences of September 11 and the Ongoing Threat of Terrorist Attacks in America," 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 815-34 (2002).

top

Human Rights / Civil Rights

• Dunwody Distinguished Lecture in Law: Nationalism in the Age of Terror." Lecture by Viet D. Dinh; commentaries by Maxwell O. Chibundu, Amitai Etzioni, Winston P. Nagan, Craig Hammer, Jordan J. Paust, John Quigley & Brad R. Roth. 56 Florida Law Review 867-1050 (2004).
• Emanuel Gross, "The Struggle of a Democracy Against Terrorism-Protection of Human Rights: The Right to Privacy Versus the National Interest-The Proper Balance," 37 Cornell International Law Journal 27-93 (2004).
• Paul Hoffman, "Human Rights and Terrorism," 26 Human Rights Quarterly 932-53 (2004).
• Stephen J. Ellmann, "Racial Profiling and Terrorism," 19 New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 305-60 (2003).
• Nadine Strossen, "Maintaining Human Rights in a Time of Terrorism: A Case Study in the Value of Legal Scholarship in Shaping Law and Public Policy," 19 New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 3-23 (2003).
• Jeffrey F. Addicott, "Into the Star Chamber:  Does the United States Engage in the Use of Torture or Similar Illegal Practices in the War on Terror?" 92 Kentucky Law Journal 849-912 (2003-2004).
• R. Richard, Banks, "Racial Profiling and Antiterrorism Efforts," 89 Cornell Law Review 1201-17 (2004).
• Tom Stephens, "Civil Liberties after September 11th: Background of a Crisis," 61 Guild Practitioner 4 (2004).
• Paul Rosenzweig, "Civil Liberty and the Response to Terrorism," 42 Duquesne Law Review 663-723 (2004).
• Stephen J. Ellmann, "Racial Profiling and Terrorism," 46 New York Law School Law Review 675-730 (2002-2003).
• Robert M. Chesney, "Civil Liberties and the Terrorism Prevention Paradigm: The Guilt by Association Critique." (Reviewing David Cole & James X. Dempsey, Terrorism and the Constitution: Sacrificing Civil Liberties in the Name of National Security; and David Cole, Enemy Aliens: Double Standards and Constitutional Freedoms in the War on Terrorism.) 101 Michigan Law Review 1408-52 (2003).
• Kevin R. Johnson, "Civil Liberties Post-September 11: A Time of Danger, a Time of Opportunity," 2 Seattle Journal for Social Justice 3-11 (2003).
• Nadine Strossen, "Suspected Terrorists One and All: Reclaiming Basic Civil Liberties in the Total Information Awareness Age," 2 Seattle Journal for Social Justice 15-21 (2003).
• Pramila Jayapal, "Standing Together: A Call for Unity in the Post-September 11 Battle for Civil Liberties," 2 Seattle Journal for Social Justice 101-13 (2003).
• Shawn Boyne, "The Future of Liberal Democracies in a Time of Terror: A Comparison of the Impact on Civil Liberties in the Federal Republic of Germany and the United States," 11 Tulsa Journal of Comparative & International Law 111-78 (2003).
• Robert N. Davis, "Striking the Balance: National Security vs. Civil Liberties," 29 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 175-238 (2003).
• Neal Devins, "Congress, Civil Liberties, and the War on Terrorism," 11 William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 1139-54 (2003).
• Steven W. Bender, "Sight, Sound, and Stereotype: The War on Terrorism and Its Consequences for Latinas/os," 81 Oregon Law Review 1153-78 (2002).
• Vijay Sekhon, "The Civil Rights of `Others': Antiterrorism, the Patriot Act, and Arab and South Asian American Rights in Post-9/11 American Society," 8 Texas Forum on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights 117-48 (2003).
• "After 9/11, an Assault on Civil Liberties," Trial, Oct. 2003, at 56.
• Deborah A. Ramirez, Jennifer Hoopes & Tara Lai Quinlan, "Defining Racial Profiling in a Post-September 11 World," 40 American Criminal Law Review 1195-1233 (2003).
• Mariano-Florentino Cuellar, "Choosing Anti-Terror Targets by National Origin and Race," 6 Harvard Latino Law Review 9-39 (2003).
• Frank Kearns, "Attorney-Client Privilege for Suspected Terrorists:  Impact of the New Federal Regulation on Suspected Terrorists in Federal Custody," 27 Nova Law Review 475-99 (2003).
• Anthony Lewis, "Kastenmeier Lecture. Civil Liberties in a Time of Terror," 2003 Wisconsin Law Review 257-72.
• Donald A. Downs & Erik Kinnunen, "A Response to Anthony Lewis: Civil Liberties in a New Kind of War," 2003 Wisconsin Law Review 385-412.
• Mark Tushnet, "Defending Korematsu? Reflections on Civil Liberties in Wartime," 2003 Wisconsin Law Review 273-307.
• Derek Jinks, "International Human Rights Law and the War on Terrorism," 31 Denver Journal of International Law & Policy 58-68 (2002).
• Catalina Joos Vergara, "Trading Liberty for Security in the Wake of September Eleventh: Congress' Expansion of Preventive Detention of Non-Citizens," 17 Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 115-33 (2002).
• Lisa Finnegan Abdolian & Harold Takooshian, "The USA PATRIOT Act: Civil Liberties, the Media, and Public Opinion," 30 Fordham Urban Law Journal 1429-53 (2003).
• Christopher H. Lytton, "America's Borders and Civil Liberties in a Post-September 11th World," 12 Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 197-216 (2003).
• Jules Lobel, "The War on Terrorism and Civil Liberties," 63 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 767-90 (2002).
• Thomas W. Joo, "Presumed Disloyal: Executive Power, Judicial Deference, and the Construction of Race Before and After September 11," 34 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 1-47 (2002).
• Emanuel Gross, "The Influence of Terrorist Attacks on Human Rights in the United States: The Aftermath of September 11, 2001," 28 North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation 1-101 (2002).
• John Finn, "Comments on the Proceedings [of the Symposium: Civil Liberties after September 11th: A Closer Look at Detention Powers]," 34 Connecticut Law Review 1201-07 (2002).
• Robert M. Langer, "Symposium Introduction: Civil Liberties after September 11th: A Closer Look at Detention Powers," 34 Connecticut Law Review 1143-44 (2002).
• Jan C. Ting, " Unobjectionable But Insufficient-Federal Initiatives in Response to the September 11th Terrorist Attacks," 34 Connecticut Law Review 1145-62 (2002).
• Makau Mutua, "Terrorism and Human Rights: Power, Culture, and Subordination," 8 Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 1-13 (2002).
• Frank H. Wu, "Profiling in the Wake of September 11: The Precedent of the Japanese American Internment," Criminal Justice, Summer 2002, at 52.
• David A. Harris, "Racial Profiling Revisited: 'Just Common Sense' in the Fight Against Terror?" Criminal Justice, Summer 2002, at 36.
• Viet D. Dinh, "Freedom and Security after September 11," 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 399-406 (2002).
• Philip B. Heymann, "Civil Liberties and Human Rights in the Aftermath of September 11," 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 441-56 (2002).
• Jennifer C. Evans, "Hijacking Civil Liberties: The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001," 33 Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal 933-90 (2002).
• Civil Liberties after Sept. 11. Articles by Tom Campbell, Marin R. Scordato & Paula A. Monopoli. 13 Stanford Law & Policy Review 183-203 (2002).
• Mark A.Drumbl, "Judging the 11 September Terrorist Attack," 24 Human Rights Quarterly 323-60 (2002).
• ABA Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities, Human Rights, Vol. 29, No. 1 (Winter 2002) issue on Justice in a New Era? Contains articles on "USA Patriot Act;" "Intelligence, Terrorism, and Civil Liberties;" "Civil Liberties in a Time of Crisis;" "Terrorizing Immigrants in the Name of Fighting Terrorism;" "Alien Justice: What's Wrong with Military Trials of Terrorist Suspects?"; "Military Tribunals;" "In Defense of Liberty at a Time of National Emergency;" "Civil Liberties and Human Rights in the Aftermath of September 11;" "First Thoughts on the New Money Laundering Act;" and "Crisis Mode: Information Dissemination during Times of Conflict."

top

Immigration

• Nora V. Demleitner, "Misguided Prevention: The War on Terrorism as a War on Immigrant Offenders and Immigration Violators," 40 Criminal Law Bulletin 550-75 (2004).
• Asli U Bali, "Changes in Immigration Law and Practice after September 11: A Practitioner's Perspective," 2 Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal 161-77 (2003).
• David Treyster, "Foreign Students v. National Security: Will Denying Education Prevent Terrorism?" 19 New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 497-527 (2003).
• Caroline P. Lavelle, "Access to Deportation Proceedings Following September 11: A Return to the Fundamentals of Richmond Newspapers," 48 St. Louis University Law Journal 1101-42 (2004).
• Theresa Sidebothom, "Immigration Policies and the War on Terrorism," 32 Denver Journal of International Law & Policy 539-81 (2004).
• David Treyster, "Foreign Students v. National Security: Will Denying Education Prevent Terrorism?" 46 New York Law School Law Review 867-97 (2002-2003).
• David A. Martin, "Preventive Detention: Immigration Law Lessons for the Enemy Combatant Debate," 18 Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 305-27 (2004).
• Susan Martin & Philip Martin, "International Migration and Terrorism: Prevention, Prosecution and Protection," 18 Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 329-44 (2004).
• Mark Bastian, "The Spectrum of Uncertainty Left by Zadvydas v. Davis: Is the Alien Detention Provision of the USA Patriot Act Constitutional?" 47 New York Law School Law Review 395-421 (2003).
• Karen Engle, "Constructing Good Aliens and Good Citizens: Legitimizing the War on Terror(ism)," 75 University of Colorado Law Review 59-114 (2004).
• Richard A. Boswell, "Racism and U.S. Immigration Law: Prospects for Reform after "9/11?"" 7 Journal of Gender, Race & Justice 315-56 (2003).
• Jan Ting, "Immigration Law Reform after 9/11: What Has Been and What Still Needs to Be Done," 17 Temple International & Comparative Law Journal 503-21 (2003).
• Howard W. Chu, "Is Richmond Newspapers in Peril after 9/11?" 64 Ohio State Law Journal 1655-76 (2003).
• Thomas V. Ayala, "Development of the First Amendment Right of Access to Adjudicatory Hearings in the Third Circuit: Does the Ongoing Threat of Terrorism Call for a Secret Justice System?" (North Jersey Media Group, Inc. v. Ashcroft, 308 F.3d 198, 3d Cir. 2002.) 48 Villanova Law Review 1303-27 (2003).
• J. Andrew Walkup, "Please Take Back Your Huddled Masses: A Look at the First Amendment Right to Access Deportation Hearings after September 11, 2001,"  22 St. Louis University Public Law Review 593-630 (2003).
• Dana B. Weiss, "Protecting America First: Deporting Aliens Associated with Designated Terrorist Organizations That Have Committed Terrorism in America in the Face of Actual Threats to National Security," 50 Cleveland State Law Review 307-34 (2003).
• Marie A. Taylor, "Immigration Enforcement Post-September 11: Safeguarding the Civil Rights of Middle Eastern-American and Immigrant Communities," 17 Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 63-113 (2002).
• Victor C. Romero, "Decoupling `Terrorist' from 'Immigrant:' An Enhanced Role for the Federal Courts Post 9/11," 7 Journal of Gender, Race & Justice 201-11 (2003).
• Megan Peitzke, "The Fate of `Unremovable' Aliens Before and After September 11, 2001: The Supreme Court's Presumptive Six-Month Limit to Post-Removal Period Detention. (Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 2001)," 30 Pepperdine Law Review 769-814 (2003).
• Kevin R. Johnson, "September 11 and Mexican Immigrants: Collateral Damage Comes Home," 52 DePaul Law Review 849-70 (2003).
• Victor C. Romero, "Proxies for Loyalty in Constitutional Immigration Law: Citizenship and Race after September 11," 52 DePaul Law Review 871891 (2003).
• Matthew R. Hall, "Procedural Due Process Meets National Security: The Problem of Classified Evidence in Immigration Proceedings," 35 Cornell International Law Journal 515-32 (2002).
• Lawrence M. Lebowitz & Ira L. Podheiser, "A Summary of the Changes in Immigration Policies and Practices after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001: The USA Patriot Act and Other Measures," 63 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 873-88 (2002).
• Peter Margulies, "Uncertain Arrivals: Immigration, Terror, and Democracy after September 11," 2002 Utah Law Review 481-517.
• Adrienne R. Bellino, "Changing Immigration for Arabs with Anti-Terrorism Legislation: September 11th Was Not the Catalyst," 16 Temple International & Comparative Law Journal 123-46 (2002).
• Nora V. Demleitner, "Immigration Threats and Rewards: Effective Law Enforcement Tools in the "War" on Terrorism?" 51 Emory Law Journal 1059-94 (2002).
• Sylvia R. Lazos Vargas, "Missouri, the 'War on Terrorism,' and Immigrants: Legal Challenges Post 9/11," 67 Missouri Law Review 775-830 (2002).
• Susan M. Akram & Kevin R. Johnson, "Race, Civil Rights, and Immigration Law after September 11, 2001: The Targeting of Arabs and Muslims. 58 New York University Annual Survey of American Law 295-355 (2002).
• Sameer M. Ashar, "Immigration Enforcement and Subordination: The Consequences of Racial Profiling after September 11," 34 Connecticut Law Review 1185-99 (2002).
• "Responding to Post-9-11 Attacks on Immigrants and Activists: Lessons from Guild History and Experience," 59 Guild Practitioner 12-20 (Winter 2002).
• Barbara Hines, "So Near Yet So Far Away: The Effect of September 11th on Mexican Immigrants in the United States," 8 Texas Hispanic Journal of Law & Policy 37-46 (2002).
• Steven S. Miller & Laurie Bernbaum, "Immigration Law and Civil Rights: Where Do Aliens Stand after 9/11?", Washington State Bar News, March 2002, http://www.wsba.org/barnews/2002/03/miller-bernbaum.htm.

top

Insurance

• Saul Levmore & Kyle D. Logue, "Insuring Against Terrorism--and Crime," 102 Michigan Law Review 268-327 (2003).
• Richard R. Stedman, II, "Of Hurricanes and Airplanes: The Congressional Knee-Jerk Reaction to September 11," 49 Loyola Law Review 997-1023 (2003).
• Irene S. Kaptzis, "Looking Beyond the Sunset: International Perspectives on the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 and the Issue of Its Renewal," 29 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 827-96 (2004).
• David C. Marlett, John Griffith, Carl Pacini & Robert E. Hoyt, "Terrorism Insurance Coverage: The Market Impact on Insurers and Other Exposed Industries," 22 Journal of Insurance Regulation 41-62 (Winter 2003).
• Lucien J. Dhooge, "A Previously Unimaginable Risk Potential: September 11 and the Insurance Industry," 40 American Business Law Journal 687-779 (2003).
• Andrew S. Neuwelt, "The Impact of September 11 on Terrorism Insurance: Comparing Senate Bill 2600, House of Representatives Bill 3210, and the United Kingdom's Pool Re," 9 ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 473-500 (2003).
• Lucien J. Dhooge, "The Terrorism Insurance Market after September 11:  The Case for Limited Federal Intervention," 34 McGeorge Law Review 27-63 (2002).
• Patrick Bonner, "Insurance and Liability Issues Relating to an Oil Spill Caused by Terrorism," 77 Tulane Law Review 1157-81 (2003).
• Desmond Derrington, "Occurrences:  The World Trade Center Insurance Question," 13 Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 831-46 (2003).
• Graydon S. Staring, "Insurance and Reinsurance of Marine Interests in the New Age of Terrorism," 77 Tulane Law Review 1371-1905 (2003).
• Jeffrey E. Thomas, "Exclusion of Terrorist-Related Harms from Insurance Coverage: Do the Costs Justify the Benefits?" 36 Indiana Law Review 397-423 (2003).
• Terrence Chorvat & Elizabeth Chorvat, "Income Tax as Implicit Insurance Against Losses from Terrorism," 36 Indiana Law Review 425-46 (2003).
• Anne Gron & Alan O. Sykes, "Terrorism and Insurance Markets: A Role for the Government as Insurer?" 36 Indiana Law Review 447-63 (2003).
• Mark Boran, "To Insure or Not to Insure, That Is the Question: Congress' Attempt to Bolster the Insurance Industry after the Attacks on September 11, 2001," 17 St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary 523-84 (2003).
• Richard P. Campbell, "The September 11th Attack on America: Ground Zero in Tort and Insurance Law," 9 Connecticut Insurance Law Journal 51-94 (2002).
• Jerry, Robert H., II. Insurance, Terrorism, and 9/11: Reflections on Three Threshold Questions. 9 Connecticut Insurance Law Journal 95-120 (2002).
• Alison R. Orlans, "Terrorism Insurance and Commercial Real Estate: The New Frontier," 7 North Carolina Banking Institute 93-124 (2003).
• Richard Allyn & Heather McNeff, "The Fall and Rise of Terrorism Insurance Coverage Since September 11, 2001," 29 William Mitchell Law Review 821-44 (2003).
• Stephen P. Watters & Joseph S. Lawder, "The Impact of September 11th on Tort Law and Insurance," 29 William Mitchell Law Review 809-20 (2003).
• Daniel James Everett, "The `War' on Terrorism: Do War Exclusions Prevent Insurance Coverage for Losses Due to Acts of Terrorism?" 54 Alabama Law Review 175-91 (2002).
• Milton Thurm, 'Liability and Other Issues Arising Out of the World Trade Center Tragedy," 53 FDCC Quarterly 49-62 (2002).
• Jeffrey R. Brown, Randall S. Kroszner & Brian H. Jenn, "Federal Terrorism Risk Insurance," 53 National Tax Journal 647-57 (2002).
• Jeffrey Thomas, "Insurance Implications of September 11 and Possible Responses," 34 Urban Lawyer 727-55 (2002).
• Jane Kendall, "The Incalculable Risk: How the World Trade Center Disaster Accelerated the Evolution of Insurance Terrorism Exclusions," 36 University of Richmond Law Review 569-96 (2002).
• Michael F. Aylward, "Insurance in a Time of War," For the Defense (May 2002) at 24.
• Robert L. Siems & Anthony R. Zelle, "Handling Claims Arising from September 11," For the Defense (May 2002) at 25.
• Lynn M. Roberson & Toysha Flowers Sharpe, "Interpreting September 11 Exclusions," For the Defense (May 2002) at 30.
• Steven J. Polansky, "Allocation of Coverage across Multiple Policies," For the Defense (May 2002) at 33.
• Michael F. Aylward, "Indemnity Issues in the World Trade Center Attacks," For the Defense (May 2002) at 38.
• Theresa W. Hajost, "Reinsurance after September 11: New Realities and Old Verities," For the Defense (May 2002) at 41.
• Mark M. Tallmadge, "Terrorism Risks: The Need for a Federal Reinsurance Backstop," For the Defense (May 2002) at 47.
• John W. Stamper, "Looking at the Events of September 11: Some Effects and Implications," 69 Defense Counsel Journal 152 (2002).
• Michael F. Aylward, "Twin Towers: The 3.6 Billion Question Arising from the World Trade Center Attacks," 69 Defense Counsel Journal 169 (2002).
• C.K. "Pete" Rowland, "Psychological Perspectives on Juror Reactions to the September 11 Events," 69 Defense Counsel Journal 180 (2002).
• Matthew H. Adler, Deborah F. Cohen & Edward T. Groh, "The `New War' in Insurance Agreements: Terrorism," Brief (Spring 2002) at 17.
• Carl J. Pernicone & James T.H. Deaver, "Insurance Implications of the World Trade Center Disaster," Brief (Spring 2002) at 23
• Richard D. Williams, "Attack on America--The Insurance Industry Response," Environmental Claims Journal, Summer/Autumn 2001, at 5.

top

International Law

• Joseph P. Bialke, "Al-Qaeda & Taliban Unlawful Combatant Detainees, Unlawful Belligerency, and the International Laws of Armed Conflict," 55 Air Force Law Review 1-85 (2004).
• Joshua E. Kastenberg, "The Use of Conventional International Law in Combating Terrorism: A Maginot Line for Modern Civilization Employing the Principles of Anticipatory Self-Defense & Preemption," 55 Air Force Law Review 87-125 (2004).
• John Yoo, "Transferring Terrorists," 79 Notre Dame Law Review 1183-1235 (2004).
• Harold Hongju Koh, "Jefferson Memorial Lecture. Transnational Legal Process after September 11th," 22 Berkeley Journal of International Law 337-54 (2004).
• Madeline Morris, "Terrorism and Unilateralism: Criminal Jurisdiction and International Relations," 36 Cornell International Law Journal 473-89 (2004).
• Lucy Martinez, "September 11th, Iraq, and the Doctrine of Anticipatory Self-Defense," 52 UMKC Law Review 123-91 (2003).
• Kim Lane Scheppele,, "Other People's PATRIOT Acts: Europe's Response to September 11," 50 Loyola Law Review 89-148 (2004).
• Nels S.D. Peterson, "New Wine in Old Wineskins: Thinking about Structural Barriers to an Effective International Legal Approach to Terrorism," 12 Willamette Journal of International Law & Dispute Resolution 90-99 (2004).
• Erin L. Guruli, "The Terrorism Era: Should the International Community Redefine Its Legal Standards on Use of Force in Self-Defense?" 12 Willamette Journal of International Law & Dispute Resolution 100-23 (2004).
• Fiona McKay, "U.S. Unilateralism and International Crimes: The International Criminal Court and Terrorism," 36 Cornell International Law Journal 455-71 (2004).
• Madeline Morris, "Terrorism and Unilateralism: Criminal Jurisdiction and International Relations," 36 Cornell International Law Journal 473-89 (2004).
• Olivera Medenica, "The World Bank, the IMF and the Global Prevention of Terrorism: A Role for Conditionalities," 29 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 663-707 (2004).
• Edieth Y. Wu, "Global Responses and Recourses to Terrorism," 25 Whittier Law Review 521-62 (2004).
• Jeremie J. Wattellier, "Comparative Legal Responses to Terrorism: Lessons from Europe," 27 Hastings International & Comparative Law Review 397-419 (2004).
• Sarah E. Smith, "International Law: Blaming Big Brother: Holding States Accountable for the Devastation of Terrorism," 56 Oklahoma Law Review 735-75 (2003).
• Richard A. Falk, "Rediscovering International Law after September 11th." 16 Temple International & Comparative Law Journal 359-69 (2002).
• John C. Yoo & James C. Ho, "The Status of Terrorists," 44 Virginia Journal of International Law 207-28 (2003).
• Leila Nadya Sadat, "Terrorism and the Rule of Law," 3 Washington University Global Studies Law Review 135-54 (2004).
• Matthew Scott King, "The Legality of the United States' War on Terror: Is Article 51 a Legitimate Vehicle for the War in Afghanistan or Just a Blanket to Cover-up International War Crimes?" 9 ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 457-72 (2003).
• J.M.B.  Porter, "Osama Bin-Laden, Jihad, and the Sources of International Terrorism," 13 Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 871-85 (2003).
• David Williams, "The United Kingdom's Response to International Terrorism," 13 Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 683-97 (2003).
• Desmond Derrington, "The Terrorist Threat: Australia's Response," 13 Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 699-704 (2003).
• James Gomez, "September 11: Asian Perspectives," 13 Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 705-18 (2003).
• Jan Wouters & Frederik Naert, "The European Union and 'September 11'," 13 Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 719-75 (2003).
• Mark A. Drumbl, "Terrorist Crime, Taliban Guilt, Western Victims, and International Law," 31 Denver Journal of International Law & Policy 69-79 (2002).
• James A.R. Nafziger, "The Grave New World of Terrorism: A Lawyer's View," 31 Denver Journal of International Law & Policy 1-22 (2002).
• Philip A. Thomas, "9/11: USA and UK," 26 Fordham International Law Journal 1193-1233 (2003).
• Tawia Ansah, "War: Rhetoric & Norm Creation in Response to Terror," 43 Virginia Journal of International Law 797-860 (2003).
• Matthew Lippman, "The New Terrorism and International Law," 10 Tulsa Journal of Comparative & International Law 297-368 (2003).
• Sharon Harzenski, "Terrorism, a History: Stage One," 12 Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 137-96 (2003).
• Michael A. Goldberg, "Mirage of Defense: Reexamining Article Five of the North Atlantic Treaty after the Terrorist Attacks on the United States," 26 Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 77-93 (2003).
• Yutaka Arai-Takahashi, "Shifting Boundaries of the Right of Self-Defence--Appraising the Impact of the September 11 Attacks on Jus Ad Bellum," 36 International Lawyer 1081-1102 (2002).
• John W. Head, "Essay: What Has Not Changed Since September 11--The Benefits of Multilateralism," 12 Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy 1-12 (2002).
• Elena Katselli & and Sangeeta Shah, "September 11 and the UK Response," 52 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 245-55 (2003).
• Steve Peers, "EU Responses to Terrorism," 52 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 227-43 (2003).
• Mark A. Drumbl, "Victimhood in Our Neighborhood: Terrorist Crime, Taliban Guilt, and the Asymmetries of the International Legal Order," 81 North Carolina Law Review 1-113 (2002).
• Joshua D. Zelman, "Recent Developments in International Law: Anti-Terrorism Legislation--Part Two: The Impact and Consequences," 11 Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 421-41 (2002).
• The Law and Terrorism Panel Discussion. Introduction by student Erin Kanterman; panelists: David S. Cohen, Bennett Gershman, Ralph M. Stein & Randolph M. McLaughlin. 14 Pace International Law Review 1-25 (2002).
• Arthur C. Helton & Dessie P. Zagorcheva, "Globalization, Terror, and the Movements of People," 36 International Lawyer 91-101 (2002).
• John Alan Cohan, "Formulation of a State's Response to Terrorism and State-Sponsored Terrorism," 14 Pace International Law Review 77-119 (2002).
• James D. Fry, "Terrorism as a Crime Against Humanity and Genocide: The Backdoor to Universal Jurisdiction," 7 UCLA Journal of International Law & Foreign Affairs 169-99 (2002).
• Ratna Kapur, "Un-veiling Women's Rights in the `War on Terrorism'." 9 Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy 211-25 (2002).
• Cheri Ganeles, "Technological Advancements and the Evolution of Terrorism," 8 ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 617-61 (2002).
• S. Foster, "An American Inquiry into Contemporary Terrorist Accountability," 6 Texas Review of Law & Politics 513-39 (2002).
• Sompng Sucharitkul, "Jurisdiction, Terrorism and the Rule of International Law," 32 Golden Gate University Law Review 311-23 (2002).
• Jack M. Beard, "America's New War on Terror: The Case for Self-Defense under International Law," 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 559-90 (2002).
• Joshua D. Zelman, "Recent Developments in International Law: Anti-Terrorism Legislation--Part One: An Overview," 11 Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 183-200 (2001).
• Michael Byers, "Terrorism, the Use of Force and International Law after 11 September 2001," 51 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 401-14 (2002).
• Hale E. Sheppard, "Salvaging Trade, Economic and Political Relations with Mexico in the Aftermath of the Terrorist Attacks: A Call for a Reevaluation of U.S. Law and Policy," 20 Boston University International Law Journal 33-72 (2002).
• Maryann Cusimano Love, "Globalization, Ethics, and the War on Terrorism," 16 Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy 65-80 (2002).
• Emanuel Gross, "Thwarting Terrorist Acts by Attacking the Perpetrators or Their Commanders as an Act of Self-Defense: Human Rights Versus the State's Duty to Protect Its Citizens," 15 Temple International & Comparative Law Journal 195-246 (2001).
• Michael J. Kelly, "Understanding September 11th--An International Legal Perspective on the War in Afghanistan. 35 Creighton Law Review 283-93 (2002).
• Ann-Marie Slaughter & William Burke-White, "An International Constitutional Moment," 43 Harvard International Law Journal 1 (2002).
• Harold Hongju Koh, "The Spirit of the Laws," 43 Harvard International Law Journal 23 (2002).
• Sean D. Murphy, "Terrorism and the Concept of "Armed Attack" in Article 51 of the U.N. Charter," 43 Harvard International Law Journal 41 (2002).
• Frank E. Vogel, "The Trial of Terrorists under Classical Islamic Law," 43 Harvard International Law Journal 53 (2002).
• Alfred P. Rubin, "Legal Response to Terror: An International Criminal Court?" 43 Harvard International Law Journal 65 (2002).
• M. Cherif Bassiouni, "Legal Control of International Terrorism: A Policy-Oriented Assessment," 43 Harvard International Law Journal 83 (2002).
• Russell Morris Iger, "United States v. Usama Bin Laden." 14 New York International Law Review 241-245 (Winter 2001).
• John W. Head, "The United States and International Law after September 11," Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, Fall 2001, at 1.
• Stephanie Nicolas, "Negotiating in the Shadow of Outlaws: A Problem-Solving Paradigm for Unconventional Opponents." 9 Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 385-418 (Spring 2000).
• W. M. Reisman, "International Responses to International Terrorism," 22 Houston Journal of International Law 3 (1999).
• Maureen Brennan, "Avoiding Anarchy: Bin Laden Terrorism, the U.S. Response, and the Role of Customary International Law." 59 Louisiana Law Review 1195-1223.
• Kathryn Elliott, "The New World Order and the Right of Self-Defense in the United Nations Charter." 15 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 55-81 (1991).
• D. W. Greig, "Self-Defence and the Security Council: What Does Article 51 Require?" 40 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 366-402 (1991).
• Françoise Hampson, "Belligerent Reprisals and the 1977 Protocols to the Geneva Conventions of 1949." 37 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 818-43 (1988).
• "Reviving the Doctrine of Non-Forcible Countermeasures: Resolving the Effect of Third Party Injuries." 29 Virginia Journal of International Law 175-209 (1988).

top

Military Actions

• Michael J. Garcia, "A Necessary Response: The Lack of Domestic and International Constraints upon a U.S. Nuclear Response to a Terrorist Attack," 1 Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 515-54 (2003).
• Matthew L. Sandgren, "War Redefined in the Wake Of September 11: Were the Attacks Against Iraq Justified?" 12 Michigan State Journal of International Law 1-61 (2003).
• Rens Van Munster, "The War on Terrorism: When the Exception Becomes the Rule," 17 International Journal for Semiotics Law 141-53 (2004).
• Jason Pedigo, "Rogue States, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and Terrorism: Was Security Council Approval Necessary for the Invasion of Iraq?" 32 Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 199-229 (2004).
• Tom A.Gizzo & Tama S. Monoson, "A Call to Arms: The Posse Comitatus Act and the Use of the Military in the Struggle Against International Terrorism," 15 Pace International Law Review 149-80 (2003).
• Stacie D. Gorman, "In the Wake of Tragedy: The Citizens Cry Out for War, But Can the United States Legally Declare War on Terrorism?" 21 Pennsylvania State International Law Review 669-88 (2003).
• Christopher Greenwood, "International Law and the Pre-Emptive Use of Force: Afghanistan, Al-Qaida, and Iraq," 4 San Diego International Law Journal 7-37 (2003).
• Derek Jinks, "September 11 and the Laws of War," 28 Yale Journal of International Law 1-49 (2003).
• Emanuel Gross, "Use of Civilians as a Human Shield: What Legal and Moral Restrictions Pertain to a War Waged by a Democratic State Against Terrorism?" 16 Emory International Law Review 445-524 (2002).
• Davis Brown, "Use of Force Against Terrorism after September 11th: State Responsibility, Self-Defense and Other Responses," 11 Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law 1-53 (2003).
• Ronald J. Sievert, "War on Terrorism or Global Law Enforcement Operation?" 78 Notre Dame Law Review 307-53 (2003).
• Steven Plitt, "The Changing Face of Global Terrorism and a New Look of War: An Analysis of the War-Risk Exclusion in the Wake of the Anniversary of September 11, and Beyond," 39 Willamette Law Review 31-92 (2003).
• Thomas Geraghty, " The Criminal-Enemy Distinction: Prosecuting a Limited War Against Terrorism Following the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks," 33 McGeorge Law Review 551-591 (2002).
• Committee on International Security Affairs of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, "The Legality and Constitutionality of the
  President's Authority to Initiate an Invasion of Iraq," 41 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 15-32 (2002).
• Michael C. Bonafede, "Here, There, and Everywhere: Assessing the Proportionality Doctrine and U.S. Uses of Force in Response to Terrorism after the September 11 Attacks," 88 Cornell Law Review 155-214 (2002).
• Annemarie Sedore, "War Risk Exclusions in the 21st Century: Applying War Risk Exclusions to the Attacks of September 11th," 82 Boston University Law Review 1041-61 (2002).
• Barry A. Feinstein, "Operation Enduring Freedom: Legal Dimensions of an Infinitely Just Operation," 11 Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 201-95 (2002).
• Robert F. Turner, "The War on Terrorism and the Modern Relevance of the Congressional Power to `Declare War'," 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 519-37 (2002).
• Rudolph Giuliani, "Combatting Terrorism," 16 Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy 57-63 (2002).
• Emanuel Gross, "Democracy's Struggle Against Terrorism: The Powers of Military Commanders to Decide upon the Demolition of Houses, the Imposition of Curfews, Blockades, Encirclements and the Declaration of an Area as a Closed Military Area," 30 Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 165-231 (2002).
• David Abramowitz, "The President, the Congress, and Use of Force: Legal and Political Considerations in Authorizing the Use of Force Against International Terrorism," 43 Harvard International Law Journal 71 (2002).
• Federica Bisone, "Killing a Fly with a Cannon: The American Response to the Embassy Attacks." 20 New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law 93-115 (2000).
• G. Travalio, "Terrorism, International Law, and the Use of Military Force" 18 Wisconsin International Law Journal 145 (2000).
• Leah Campbell, "Defending Against Terrorism: A Legal Analysis of the Decision to Strike Sudan and Afghanistan." 74 Tulane Law Review 1067-1096 (February 2000).
• D. Waxman, "Terrorism: The War of the Future," 23 Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 201 (1999).
• Ruth Wedgwood, "Responding to Terrorism: The Strikes Against Bin Laden." 24 Yale Journal of International Law (Summer 1999).
• Nigel White & Robert Cryer. "Unilateral Enforcement of Resolution 687: A Treaty Too Far?" 29 California Western International Law Journal 243-282 (Spring 1999).
• Jules Lobel, "Bypassing the Security Council: Ambiguous Authorizations to Use Force, Cease-Fires and the Iraqi Inspection Regime." 93 American Journal of International Law 124-154 (January 1999).
• Dale Stephens, "Rules of Engagement and the Concept of Unit Self Defense." 45 Naval Law Review 126-151 (1998).
• Louis René Beres, "Israel, Iran and Preemption: Choosing the Least Unattractive Option under International Law." 14 Dickinson Journal of International Law 187-206 (Winter 1996).
• Matthew Lippman, "Conundrums of Armed Conflict: Criminal Defenses to Violations of the Humanitarian Law of War." 15 Dickinson Journal of International Law 1-111 (Fall 1996).
• Sage Knauft, "Proposed Guidelines for Measuring the Propriety of Armed State Responses to Terrorist Attacks." 19 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 763-788 (Summer 1996).
• Dino Kritsiotis, "The Legality of the 1993 US Missile Strike on Iraq and the Right of Self-Defence in International Law." 45 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 162-177 (January 1996).
• Richard Maxon, "Nature's Eldest Law: A Survey of a Nation's Right to Act in Self-Defense." 25 Parameters 55-68 (Autumn 1995). http://carlisle-www.army.mil/usawc/Parameters/1995/maxon.htm
• Alan Surchin, "Terror and the Law: The Unilateral Use of Force and the June 1993 Bombing of Baghdad." 5 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 457-497 (Spring 1995).
• John Quigley, "Missiles with a Message: The Legality of the United States Raid on Iraq's Intelligence Headquarters." 17 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 241-274 (Winter 1994).
• Marla Radinsky, "Retaliation: The Genesis of a Law and the Evolution Toward International Cooperation: An Application of Game Theory to Modern International Conflicts." 2 George Mason University Law Review 53-75 (Fall 1994).
• Robert Beck, "Don't Tread on Us": International Law and Forcible State Responses to Terrorism." 12 Wisconsin International Law Journal 153-219 (Spring 1994).
• Thomas Plofchan "Article 51: Limits on Self-Defense?" 13 Michigan Journal of International Law 336-373 (Winter 1992).
• Louis René Beres, "Israel and Anticipatory Self Defense." 8 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 89-99 (1991).
• Ruth Wedgwood, "The Use of Armed Force in International Affairs: Self-Defense and the Panama Invasion." 29 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 609-628 (1991).
• David Penna, "The Right to Self-Defense in the Post-Cold War Era: The Role of the United Nations." 20 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 41-54 (Fall 1991).
• Eugene Rostow, "Until What? Enforcement Action or Collective Self-Defense?" 85 American Journal of International Law 506-516 (July 1991).
• Philip Seymour, "The Legitimacy of Peacetime Reprisal as a Tool Against State-Sponsored Terrorism." 39 Naval Law Review 221-240 (1990).
• William O'Brien, "Reprisals, Deterrence and Self-Defense in Counter Terror Operations." 30 Virginia Journal of International Law 421-478 (Winter 1990).
• Edward Kwakwa, "Belligerent Reprisals in the Law of Armed Conflict." 27 Stanford Journal of International Law 49-81 (Fall 1990).
• Oscar Schachter, "The Extraterritorial Use of Force Against Terrorist Bases." 11 Houston Journal of International Law 309-316 (Spring 1989).
• Remiguisz Bierzanek, "Reprisals in Armed Conflicts." 14 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 829-843 (1988).
• David Turndoff, "The U.S. Raid on Libya: A Forceful Response to Terrorism." 14 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 187-221 (1988).
• "The Achille Lauro Incident and the Permissible Use of Force." 9 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law 481-497 (1987).
• "Military Responses to Terrorism." 81 American Society of International Law Proceedings 287-320 (1987).
• Gregory Intoccia, "American Bombing of Libya: An International Legal Analysis." 19 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 177-213 (Spring 1987).
• Jeffrey McCredie, " The April 14, 1986 Bombing of Libya: Act of Self-Defense or Reprisal?" 19 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 215-242 (Spring 1987).
• Guy Roberts, "Self-Help in Combating State-Sponsored Terrorism: Self Defense and Peacetime Reprisals." 19 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 243-293 (Spring 1987).
• Lee Stuesser, "Active Defense: State Military Response to International Terrorism." 17 California Western International Law Journal 1-42 (Winter 1987).
• "Legal Restrictions on the Right to Use Force Against International Terrorism." 10 ASILS International Law Journal 169-198 (Winter 1986).
• "Air Attacks on Neutral Shipping in the Persian Gulf: The Legality of the Iraqi Exclusion Zone and Iranian Reprisals." 9 Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 517-549 (Summer 1985).
• Barry Levenfeld, "Israel's Counter-Fedayeen Tactics in Lebanon: Self-Defense and Reprisal under Modern International Law." 21 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 1-48 (1982).

top

Military Commissions & Tribunals

• John M. Hagan, "From the XYZ Affair to the War on Terror: The Justiciability of Time of War," 61 Washington & Lee Law Review 1327-83 (2004).
• Jordan J. Paust, "Post-9/11 Overreaction and Fallacies Regarding War And Defense, Guantanamo, the Status of Persons, Treatment, Judicial Review of Detention, and Due Process in Military Commissions," 79 Notre Dame Law Review 1335-64 (2004).
• Wayne McCormack, "Military Detention and the Judiciary: Al Qaeda, the KKK and Supra-State Law," 5 San Diego International Law Journal 7-71 (2004).
• Major Joshua E. Kastenberg, "The Right to Assistance of Counsel in Military and War Crimes Tribunals: An International and Domestic Law Analysis," 14 Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 175-225 (2003).
• Brian W. Earley, "The War on Terrorism and the Enemy Within: Using Military Commissions to Prosecute U.S. Citizens for Terrorist-Related Violations of the Laws of War," 30 New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement 75-103 (2004).
• David Glazier, "Kangaroo Court or Competent Tribunal?: Judging the 21st Century Military Commission," 89 Virginia Law Review 2005-93 (2003).
• Carl Tobias, "Detentions, Military Commissions, Terrorism, and Domestic Case Precedent," 76 Southern California Law Review 1371-1407 (2003).
• David Golove, "Military Tribunals, International Law, and the Constitution: A Franckian-Madisonian Approach," 35 New York University Journal of  International Law & Politics 363-95 (2003).
• John M. Bickers, "Military Commissions Are Constitutionally Sound: A Response to Professors Katyal and Tribe," 34 Texas Tech Law Review 899-932 (2003).
• Robert John Araujo, "A Judicial Response to Terrorism: The Status of Military Commissions under Domestic and International Law," 11 Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law 117-40 (2003).
• Damon Coletta, "Military Tribunals and the Delicate Nature of President Bush's Unilateralist Foreign Policy," 12 Journal of Legal Studies 63-85 (2003).
• Jim Davis, "A Cautionary Tale: Examining the Use of Military Tribunals by the United States in the Aftermath of the September 11 Attacks in Light of Peru's History of Human Rights Abuses Resulting from Similar Measures," 31 Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 423-57 (2003).
• James B. Insco, "Defense of Superior Orders Before Military Commissions," 13 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 389-418 (2003).
• Roberto Iraola, "Military Tribunals, Terrorists, and the Constitution," 33 New Mexico Law Review 95-114 (2003).
• Keith S. Alexander, "In the Wake of September 11th: The Use of Military Tribunals to Try Terrorists," 78 Notre Dame Law Review 885-916 (2003).
• Kathleen M. McCarroll, "With Liberty and Justice for All: The November 13, 2001 Military Order Allowing the Use of Military Tribunals to Try Those Suspected of Aiding Terrorists Violates the Rights Guaranteed to Non-Citizen United States Residents under the Constitution," 80 University of Detroit Mercy Law Review 231-48 (2003).
• Jonathan Turley, "Tribunals and Tribulations: The Antithetical Elements of Military Governance in a Madisonian Democracy," 70 George Washington Law Review 649-768 (2002).
• Gerard J. Clark, "Military Tribunals and the Separation of Powers," 63 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 837-71 (2002).
• Heather Anne Maddox, "After the Dust Settles: Military Tribunal Justice for Terrorists after September 11, 2001," 28 North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation 421-76 (2002).
• Ryan H. Beery, "Modern Use of Military Tribunals: A Legal `Can' and a Political `Should'," 28 Ohio Northern University Law Review 789-813 (2002).
• Jack Goldsmith & Cass R. Sunstein, "Military Tribunals and Legal Culture: What a Difference Sixty Years Makes," 19 Constitutional Commentary 261-89 (2002).
• Anne English French, "Trials in Times of War: Do the Bush Military Commissions Sacrifice Our Freedoms? 63 Ohio State Law Journal 1225-83
  (2002).
• Jordan J. Paust, "Antiterrorism Military Commissions: The Ad Hoc DOD Rules of Procedure," 23 Michigan Journal of International Law 677-94 (2002).
• Daryl A. Mundis, "The Use of Military Commissions to Prosecute Individuals Accused of Terrorist Acts," 96 American Journal of International Law 320 (2002).
• Michael J. Matheson, "U.S. Military Commissions: One of Several Options," 96 American Journal of International Law 354 (2002).
• Christopher M. Evans, "Terrorism on Trial: The President's Constitutional Authority to Order the Prosecution of Suspected Terrorists by Military Commission," 51 Duke Law Journal 1831-56 (2002).
• Michal R. Belknap, "A Putrid Pedigree: The Bush Administration's Military Tribunals in Historical Perspective," 38 California Western Law Review 433-80 (2002).
• John P. Elwood, "Prosecuting the War on Terrorism: The Government's Position on Attorney-Client Monitoring, Detainees, and Military Tribunals," Criminal Justice, Summer 2002, at 30.
• Eric M. Freedman, "The Bush Military Tribunals: Where Have We Been? Where Are We Going?" Criminal Justice, Summer 2002, at 14.
• Kenneth Anderson, "What to Do with Bin Laden and Al Qaeda Terrorists?: A Qualified Defense of Military Commissions and United States Policy on Detainees at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 591-34 (2002).
• George P. Fletcher, "On Justice and War: Contradictions in the Proposed Military Tribunals," 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 635-52 (2002).
• Diane F. Orentlicher & Robert Kogod Goldman, "When Justice Goes to War: Prosecuting Terrorists before Military Commissions," 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 653-63 (2002).
• Judge Juan R. Torruella, "On the Slippery Slopes of Afghanistan: Military Commissions and the Exercise of Presidential Power," 4 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 648-734 (2002).
• Charles Pena, "Blowback: The Unintended Consequences of Military Tribunals," 16 Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy 119-31 (2002).
• Jordan J. Paust, " Antiterrorism Military Commissions: Courting Illegality," 23 Michigan Journal of International Law 1-29 (2001).

top

Nuclear Weapons

• Larry D. Johnson, "The Threat of Nuclear Terrorism and September 11th: Wake-Up Call to Get the Treaties Right," 31 Denver Journal of International Law & Policy 80-86 (2002).
• Samantha Brady Carter, "Defining Nuclear Threats and Vulnerabilities after September 11, 2001: A Legal Planning Analysis to Establish National and International Solutions and Standards," 9 Widener Law Symposium Journal 549-92 (2003).
• Robert Chesney, "National Insecurity: Availability and the Threat of Nuclear Terrorism," 20 Loyola Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Journal 29 (1997).

top

Privacy & Surveillance

• Charlie Cassidy & Cassandra Porsch, "Government Monitoring of Attorney-Client Communications in Terrorism-Related Cases: Ethical Implications for Defense Attorneys," 17 Georgetown Journal on Legal Ethics 681-95 (2004).
• Nancy Tribbensee, "Privacy and Security in Higher Education Computing Environments after the USA PATRIOT Act," 30 Journal of College & University Law 337-61 (2004).
• Ellen S. Podgor & John Wesley Hall, "Government Surveillance of Attorney-Client Communications: Invoked in the Name of Fighting Terrorism," 17 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 145-63 (2003).
• William C. Banks, "And the Wall Came Tumbling Down: Secret Surveillance after the Terror," 57 University of  Miami Law Review 1147-194 (2003).
• Tania Cruz, "Judicial Scrutiny of National Security: Executive Restrictions of Civil Liberties When `Fears and Prejudices Are Aroused'."2 Seattle Journal for Social Justice 129-97 (2003).
• Natsu Taylor Saito, "For `Our' Security: Who is an `American' and What Is Protected by Enhanced Law Enforcement and Intelligence Powers?" 2 Seattle Journal for Social Justice 23-84 (2003).
• Jeremy C. Smith, "The USA Patriot Act: Violating Reasonable Expectations of Privacy Protected by the Fourth Amendment Without Advancing National Security," 82 North Carolina Law Review 412-55 (2003).
• Peter G. Madrinan, "Devil in the Details: Constitutional Problems Inherent in the Internet Surveillance Provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001," 64 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 783-834 (2003).
• Marianne Kerber & Alexis M. Thomas, "The Erosion of Privacy after September 11: A Call to Arms for the Protection of the Attorney-Client Relationship in the Face of a National Crisis," 6 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 693-705 (2003).
• John D.Podesta, "Shadow Creep: Government Secrecy Since 9/11,"  2002 University of Illinois Journal of Law Technology & Policy 361-72.
• Lance Davis, "The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court's May 17 Opinion:  Maintaining a Reasonable Balance Between National Security and Privacy Interests," 34 McGeorge Law Review 713-29 (2003).
• Laurie Thomas Lee, "The USA PATRIOT Act and Telecommunications: Privacy under Attack," 29 Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal 371-403 (2003).
• Paul T. Jaeger, John Carlo Bertot & Charles R. McClure, "The Impact of the USA PATRIOT Act on the Collection and Analysis of Personal Information under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act," 20 Government Information Quarterly 295-314 (2003.
• Patricia Mell, "Big Brother at the Door: Balancing National Security with Privacy under the USA PATRIOT Act," 80 Denver University Law Review 375-427 (2002).
• David Hardin, "The Fuss over Two Small Words: The Unconstitutionality of the USA PATRIOT Act Amendments to FISA under the Fourth Amendment," 71 George Washington Law Review 291-345 (2003).
• Marjorie Cohn, "The Evisceration of the Attorney-Client Privilege in the Wake of September 11, 2001," 71 Fordham Law Review 1233-55 (2003).
• Kevin J. Lawner, "Post-Sept. 11th International Surveillance Activity--A Failure of Intelligence: The Echelon Interception System & the Fundamental Right to Privacy in Europe," 14 Pace International Law Review 435-80 (2002).
• Matthew Parker Voors, "Encryption Regulation in the Wake of September 11, 2001: Must We Protect National Security at the Expense of the Economy?" 55 Federal Communications Law Journal 331-52 (2003).
• Elise M. Bloom, Madeleine Schachter & Elliot H. Steelman, "Competing Interests in the Post 9-11 Workplace: The New Line Between Privacy and Safety," 29 William Mitchell Law Review 897-920 (2003).
• Orin S. Kerr, "Internet Surveillance Law after the US Patriot Act: The Big Brother That Isn't," 97 Northwestern University Law Review 607-73 (2003).
• Tammy J. Schemmel, "WWW.STOPCYBERCRIME.COM: How the USA PATRIOT Act Combats Cyber-Crime," 29 William Mitchell Law Review 921-49 (2003).
• Lisa M. Kaas, "Liberty v. Safety: Internet Privacy after September 11," 2002 Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy inaugural issue 175-189.
• Eric L. Muller, " 12/7 and 9/11: War, Liberties, and the Lessons of History," 104 West Virginia Law Review 571-92 (2002).
• Steve Hardin, "Openness, Privacy and National Security Post 9/11," 29 Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 10 (Feb/March 2003), http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Feb-03/ASISTFebMar.pdf.
• Lee S. Strickland, "Breaking Developments in Domestic Intelligence," 29 Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 20 (Feb/March 2003), http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Feb-03/ASISTFebMar.pdf.
• Michael F. Dowley, "Government Surveillance Powers under the USA PATRIOT Act: Is It Possible to Protect National Security and Privacy at the Same Time? A Constitutional Tug-of-War," 36 Suffolk University Law Review 165-83 (2002).
• Robert A. Pikowsky, "An Overview of the Law of Electronic Surveillance Post September 11, 2001." 94 Law Library Journal 601-20 (2002).
• Geraldine Gauthier, "Dangerous Liaisons: Attorney-Client Privilege, the Crime-Fraud Exception, ABA Model Rule 1.6 and Post-September 11 Counter-Terrorist Measures," 68 Brooklyn Law Review 351-78 (2002).
• Aaron Nance, "Taking the Fear Out of Electronic Surveillance in the New Age of Terror," 70 UMKC Law Review 751-79 (2002).
• Akhil Reed Amar & Vikram David Amar, "The New Regulation Allowing Federal Agents to Monitor Attorney-Client Conversations: Why It Threatens Fourth Amendment Values," 34 Connecticut Law Review 1163-67 (2002).
• Sadiq Reza, "Privacy and the Post-September 11 Immigration Detainees: The Wrong Way to a Right (and Other Wrongs)," 34 Connecticut Law Review 1169-84 (2002).
• Peter P. Swire & Lauren B. Steinfeld, "Security and Privacy After September 11: The Health Care Example," 86 Minnesota Law Review 1515-40 (2002).
• Robert Gellman, "Perspectives on Privacy and Terrorism: All Is Not Lost--Yet," 19 Government Information Quarterly 255-64 (2002).
• Robert J. Mignin, Bart A. Lazar & Josh M. Friedman, "Privacy Issues in the Workplace: A Post-September 11 Perspective," 28 Employee Relations Law Journal 7 (Summer 2002).
• Michael T. McCarthy, "Recent Development. USA PATRIOT Act. 39 Harvard Journal on Legislation 435-53 (2002).
• Steven A.Osher, "Privacy, Computers and the Patriot Act: The Fourth Amendment Isn't Dead, But No One Will insure It," 54 Florida Law Review 521-42 (2002).
• Ellen S. Podgor, "Computer Crimes and the USA PATRIOT Act," Criminal Justice, Summer 2002, at 60.
• Sharon H. Rackow, "How the USA PATRIOT Act Will Permit Governmental Infringement Upon the Privacy of Americans in the Name of "Intelligence" Investigations," 150 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1651-96 (2002).
• Michael Mello, "Friendly Fire: Privacy vs. Security after September 11," 38 Criminal Law Bulletin 367 (2002).
• Ruwantissa Abeyratne, "Attacks on America--Privacy Implications of Heightened Security Measures in the United States, Europe, and Canada," 67 Journal of Air Law and Commerce 83-115 (2002).
• Mark G. Young, "What Big Eyes and Ears You Have! A New Regime for Covert Governmental Surveillance," 70 Fordham Law Review 1017 (2001).

top

Prosecution & Judicial Process

• Jason R. Odeshoo, "Truth or Dare?: Terrorism and `Truth Serum' in the Post-9/11 World,"57 Stanford Law Review 209-55 (2004).
• Joshua L. Dratel, "Ethical Issues in Defending a Terrorism Case: How Secrecy and Security Impair the Defense of a Terrorism Case," 2 Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal 81-105 (2003).
• Arthur H. Garrison, "The War on Terrorism on the Judicial Front, Part II: The Courts Strike Back," 27 American Journal of Trial Advocacy 473-516 (2004).
• George H. Cain, "Habeas Corpus and Enemy Combatants; Where Do We Go From Here?" 15 Experience 4-9, 15 (Fall 2004).
• Jon Eldredge, "Detainment of United States Citizens as Enemy Combatants under a Fourth Amendment Historical Analysis," 6 Journal of Law & Social Challenges 19-43 (2004).
• Eric Broxmeyer, "The Problems of Security and Freedom: Procedural Due Process and the Designation of Foreign Terrorist Organizations under the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act." 22 Berkeley Journal of International Law 439-88 (2004).
• Jeewon Kim, "Making State Sponsors of Terrorism Pay: A Separation of Powers Discourse under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act," 22 Berkeley Journal of International Law 513-40 (2004).
• Murali.Jasti, "Extraditing Terrorists Hits a Death Penalty Kibosh," 22 Wisconsin International Law Journal 163-85 (2004).
• Jared A. Simmons, "In Civilian Dress and With Hostile Purpose: The Labeling of United States Citizens Captured on American Soil as Enemy Combatants: Due Process vs. National Security," 37 Indiana Law Review 579-603 (2004).
• Peter Margulies, "Judging Terror in the "Zone of Twilight": Exigency, Institutional Equity, and Procedure after September 11," 84 Boston University Law Review 383-443 (2004).
• Dana Keith, "In the Name of National Security or Insecurity?: The Potential Indefinite Detention of Noncitizen Certified Terrorists in the United States and the United Kingdom in the aftermath of September 11," 16 Florida Journal of International Law 405-81 (2004).
• Jeffrey S. Becker, "A Legal War on Terrorism: Extending New York v. Quarles and the Departure from Enemy Combatant Designations," 53 DePaul Law Review 831-73 (2003).
• Carl Tobias, "Punishment and the War on Terrorism," 6 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 1116-58 (2004).
• Jason Callen, "Unlawful Combatants and the Geneva Conventions," 44 Virginia Journal of International Law 1025-72 (2004).
• Danielle Tarin, "Will an Attack on America Justify an Attack on Americans?:  Congressional and Constitutional Prohibitions on the Executive's Power to Detain U.S. Citizens as Enemy Combatants," 44 Virginia Journal of International Law 1145-96 (2004).
• Seth N. Stratton, "Taking Terrorists to Court: A Practical Evaluation of Civil Suits Against Terrorists under the Anti-Terrorism Act," 9 Suffolk Journal of Trial & Appellate Advocacy. 27-55 (2004).
 
• Jaime Jackson, "Trial of the Accused Taliban and Al Qaeda Operatives Captured in Afghanistan and Detained on a U.S. Military Base in Cuba," 34 Cumberland Law Review 195-229 (2003-2004).
• Jaykant M. Patidar, "Citizenship and the Treatment of American Citizen Terrorists in the United States.," 42 Brandeis Law Journal 805-22 (2004).
• Randolph N. Jonakait, "A Double Due Process Denial: The Crime of Providing Material Support or Resources to Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations," 48 New York Law School Law Review 125-72 (2003/04).
• Donna R. Newman, "The Jose Padilla Story," 48 New York Law School Law Review 39-67 (2003/04).
• Sam A. Schmidt & Jusohua L. Dreatel," Turning the Tables: Using the Government's Secrecy and Security Arsenal for the Benefit of the Client in Terrorism Prosecutions," 48 New York Law School Law Review 69-90 (2003/04).
• Jared A. Simmons, "In Civilian Dress and With Hostile Purpose: The Labeling of United States Citizens Captured on American Soil as Enemy Combatants: Due Process vs. National Security," 37 Indiana Law Review 579-603 (2004).
• Seth M. Haines, "Rounding up the Usual Suspects: The Rights of Arab Detainees in a Post-September 11 World," 57 Arkansas Law Review 105-42 (2004).
• Arthur H. Garrison, "Hamdi, Padilla and Rasul: The War on Terrorism on the Judicial Front," 27 American Journal of Trial Advocacy 99-148 (2003).
• "Panel III: Criminal Law, Rule of Law, Post-September 11th Counterrorism Measures," with articles by Fletcher N. Baldwin, Jr., Alan Lambert, George Millard & Peter M. German. 16 Florida Journal of International Law 43-114 (2004).
• Kristen V. Cunningham & Jessica L. Srader, "The Post 9-11 War on Terrorism...What Does It Mean for the Attorney-Client Privilege?" 4 Wyoming Law Review 311-63 (2004).
• Andrew T. Jackola, "A Second Bite at the Apple: How the Government's Use of the Doctrine of Enemy Combatants in the Case of Zacarias Moussaoui Threatens to Upset the Future of the Criminal Justice System," 27 Hamline Law Review 101-32 (2004).
• Joshua S. Clover, "`Remember, We're the Good Guys': The Classification and Trial of the Guantanamo Bay Detainees," 45 South Texas Law Review 351-93 (2004).
• Angela A. Barkin, "Corporate America--Making a Killing: An Analysis of Why It Is Appropriate to Hold American Corporations Who Fund Terrorist Organizations Liable for Aiding and Abetting Terrorism," 40 California Western Law Review 169-93 (2003).
• Joan Fitzpatrick, "Rendition and Transfer in the War Against Terrorism: Guantanamo and Beyond," 25 Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review 457-92 (2003).
• Christopher C. Joyner, "International Extradition and Global Terrorism: Bringing International Criminals to Justice,"  25  Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review  493-541 (2003).
• Michael J. Kelly, "Cheating Justice by Cheating Death: The Doctrinal Collision for Prosecuting Foreign Terrorists--Passage of Aut Dedere Aut Judicare into Customary Law & Refusal to Extradite Based on the Death Penalty," 20 Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law 491-532 (2003).
• James Curry Woods, "The Third Tower: The Effect of the September 11th Terrorist Attacks on the American Jury System," 55 Alabama Law Review 209-29 (2003).
• Akash R. Desai, "How We Should Think about the Constitutional Status of the Suspected Terrorist Detainees at Guantanamo Bay: Examining Theories That Interpret the Constitution's Scope," 36 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1579-1618 (2003).
• Shirley C. Rivadeneira, "The Closure of Removal Proceedings of September 11th Detainees: An Analysis of Detroit Free Press, North Jersey Media Group and the Creppy Directive," 55 Administrative Law Review 843-66 (2003).
• Raquel Aldana-Pindell, "The 9/11 `National Security' Cases: Three Principles Guiding Judges' Decision-Making," 81 Oregon Law Review 985-1049 (2002).
• Neil Vidmar, "When All of Us Are Victims: Juror Prejudice and `Terrorist' Trials," 78 Chicago-Kent Law Review 1143-78 (2003).
• Keith Sealing, "Thirty Years Later: Still Playing Catch-up with the Terrorists," 30 Syracuse Journal of International Law & Commerce 339-52 (2003).
• Emanuel Gross, "Trying Terrorists--Justification for Differing Trial Rules: The Balance Between Security Consideration and Human Rights," 13 Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 777-86 (2003).
• Michael J. Kelly, "Executive Excess v. Judicial Process:  American Judicial Response to the Government's War on Terror," 13 Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 787-823 (2003).
• Amanda Schaffer, "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Terrorists: An In-Depth Analysis of the Government's Right to Classify United States Citizens Suspected of Terrorism as Enemy Combatants and Try Those Enemy Combatants by Military Commission," 30 Fordham Urban Law Journal 1465-86 (2003).
• Samantha A. Pitts-Kiefer, "Jose Padilla: Enemy Combatant or Common Criminal?" 48 Villanova Law Review 875-910 (2003).
• Anton L. Janik, Jr, "Prosecuting al Qaeda: America's Human Rights Policy Interests Are Best Served by Trying Terrorists under International Tribunals," 30 Denver Journal of International Law & Policy 498-531 (2002).
• Thomas J. Lepri, "Safeguarding the Enemy Within: The Need for Procedural Protections for U.S. Citizens Detained as Enemy Combatants under Ex Parte Quirin," 71 Fordham Law Review 2565-98 (2003).
• Lucy Martinez, "Prosecuting Terrorists at the International Criminal Court: Possibilities and Problems," 34 Rutgers Law Journal 1-62 (2002).
• Shirin Sinnar, "Patriotic or Unconstitutional? The Mandatory Detention of Aliens under the USA Patriot Act," 55 Stanford Law Review 1419-56 (2003).
• Melysa H. Sperber, "John Walker Lindh and Yaser Esam Hamdi: Closing the Loophole in International Humanitarian Law for American Nationals Captured Abroad While Fighting with Enemy Forces," 40 American Criminal Law Review 159-215 (2003).
• Nickolas A. Kacprowski, "Stacking the Deck Against Suspected Terrorists: The Dwindling Procedural Limits on the Government's Power to Indefinitely Detain United States Citizens as Enemy Combatants," 26 Seattle University Law Review 651-97 (2003).
• Hon. John C. Coughenour, "Reflections on Russia's Revival of Trial by Jury: History Demands That We Ask Difficult Questions Regarding Terror Trials, Procedures to Combat Terrorism, and Our Federal Sentencing Regime," 26 Seattle University Law Review 399-430 (2003).
• Eli Palomares, "Illegal Confinement: Presidential Authority to Suspend the Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus during Times of Emergency," 12 Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 101-37 (2002).
• Alan Clarke, "Terrorism, Extradition, and the Death Penalty," 29 William Mitchell Law Review 783-808 (2003).
• Chanterelle Sung, "Torturing the Ticking Bomb Terrorist: An Analysis of Judicially Sanctioned Torture in the Context of Terrorism," (Reviewing Alan Dershowitz, Why Terrorism Works: Understanding the Threat, Responding to the Challenge.) 23 Boston College Third World Law Journal 193-212 (2003).
• Emanuel Gross, "Trying Terrorists--Justification for Differing Trial Rules: The Balance Between Security Considerations and Human Rights," 13 Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 1-97 (2002).
• Tariq A. Shah, "Islam, Muslims and Terrorism: Secret Evidence and Guilt by Association," 10 Michigan State University-Detroit College of Law Journal of International Law 589-602 (2001).
• Roberto Iraola, "Terrorism, Grand Juries, and the Federal Material Witness Statute," 34 St. Mary's Law Journal 401-28 (2003).
• Marc J. Randazza, "Getting to Yes with Terrorists," 2002 Law Review of Michigan State University-Detroit College of Law 823-34.
• Lisa M. Ivey, "Ready, Aim, Fire? The President's Executive Order Authorizing Detention, Treatment and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens
  in the War on Terrorism Is a Powerful Weapon, But Should It Be Upheld?" 33 Cumberland Law Review 107-34 (2002-2003).
• Laura A. Dickinson, "Using Legal Process to Fight terrorism: Detentions, Military Commissions, International Tribunals, and the Rule of Law," 75 Southern California Law Review 1407-92 (2002).
• Joshua A. Ellis, "Designation of Foreign Terrorist Organizations under the AEDPA: The National Council Court Erred in Requiring Pre-Designation Process." (Nat'l Council of Resistance of Iran v. Dep't of State, 251 F.3d 192, D.C. Cir. 2001.) 2002 BYU Law Review 675-716 (2001).
• Jennifer M. Collins, "And the Walls Came Tumbling Down: Sharing Grand Jury Information with the Intelligence Community under the USA PATRIOT Act." 39 American Criminal Law Review 1261-86 (2002).
• Jennifer Trahan, "Trying a Bin Laden and Others: Evaluating the Options for Terrorist Trials," 24 Houston Journal of International Law 475-508 (2002).
• Carrie Truehart, "United States v. Bin Laden and the Foreign Intelligence Exception to the Warrant Requirement for Searches of `United States Persons' Abroad." (United States v. Bin Laden, 92 F. Supp. 2d 225, S.D.N.Y. 2000.) 82 Boston University Law Review 555-601 (2002).
• Micah Herzig, "Is Korematsu Good Law in the Face of Terrorism? Procedural Due Process in the Security Versus Liberty Debate," 16 Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 685-703 (2002).
• Sara Sun Beale & James E. Felman, "Assessing the USA PATRIOT Act's Changes to Grand Jury Secrecy," Criminal Justice, Summer 2002, at 42.
• Paul R. Rice & Benjamin Parlin Saul, "Is the War on Terrorism a War on Attorney-Client Privilege?" Criminal Justice, Summer 2002, at 22.
• Sara Sun Beale & James E. Felman, "The Consequence of Enlisting Federal Grand Juries in the War on Terrorism: Assessing the USA Patriot
  Act's Changes to Grand Jury Secrecy," 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 699-720 (2002).

top

Religion

• John Shattuck, "Religion, Rights, and Terrorism," 16 Harvard Human Rights Journal 183-88 (2003).
• Theodore P. Seto, "The Morality of Terrorism," 35 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 1227-63 (2002).
• Gordon H. Smith, "Religious Freedom and the Challenge of Terrorism," 2002 BYU Law Review 205-15.
• George Weigel, "Pope John XXIII Lecture. The Just War Tradition and the World after September 11," 51 Catholic University Law Review 689-714 (2002).
• Kate Maragliano, "Political Violence and Islam: Definitions and Web Resources," Internet Reference Services Quarterly, Vol. 6 nos. 3/4, 2002 at 47.
• Darrell Cole, "Death Before Dishonor or Dishonor Before Death? Christian Just War, Terrorism, and Supreme Emergency," 16 Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy 81-99 (2002).

Symposia & Special Issues

• Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol. 40, no. 6 (Nov.-Dec. 2004). Symposium: Civil Liberties in a Post-9/11 World.
• George Washington Law Review, Vol. 72, no. 6 (Aug. 2004). The Future of Internet Surveillance Law: A Symposium to Discuss Internet Surveillance, Privacy & the USA Patriot Act.
• Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 31, no. 4 (May 2004). The Legal Community's Response to 9/11.
• Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 69, no. 4 (Summer 2004).  David G. Trager Public Policy Symposium: Our New Federalism?  National Authority and Local Autonomy in the War on Terror.
• Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 79, no. 4 (July 2004). Symposium: The Changing Laws of War: Do We Need a New Legal Regime After September 11?
• Transnational Lawyer, Vol. 17, no. 1 (2004). Symposium: Bordering on Terror: Global Business in Times of Terror-The Legal Issues.
• Journal of College and University Law, Vol. 30, no. 2 (2004). The War on Terrorism Touches the Ivory Tower--Colleges and Universities After September 11.
• DePaul Law Review, Vol. 53, no. 2 (Winter 2003). After Disaster: The September 11th Compensation Fund and the Future of Civil Justice: Ninth Annual Clifford Symposium on Tort Law and Social Policy.
• University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law,  Vol. 6, no. 5, May 2004..22d Annual Edward V. Sparer Symposium: Terrorism and the Constitution: Civil Liberties in a New America.
• Loyola Law Review, Vol. 5, no. 1, Spring 2004: Symposium on Immigration Law and Terrorism.
• North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation, Vol. 29, no. 4 (2004):  The USA PATRIOT Act:  Privacy versus Security in a Post-9/11 World.
• Journal of College & University Law, Vol. 30, no. 2, 2004: The War on Terrorism Touches the Ivory Tower--Colleges and Universities After September 11.
• Seattle Journal for Social Justice, Vol. 2, no. 1, Fall/Winter 2003: Civil Liberties Post-September 11.
• Seton Hall Legislative Journal, Vol. 27, no. 1, 2002: Civil Liberties in a Post-9/11 World.
• Health Matrix, Vol. 13, no. 1, Winter 2003: Issues in Bioterrorism.
• Tulane Law Review, Vol. 77, nos. 5-6, June 2003: Admiralty Law Institute Symposium: Confused Seas: Admiralty Law in the Wake of Terrorism.
• Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 13, no. 3, 2003. Symposium: From Pipe Bombs to PhD-s:  International Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century.
• Valparaiso University Law Review, Vol. 37, no. 2, 2003. Symposium on Operation Enduring Freedom and the War on Terrorism.
• Wisconsin Law Review, 2003, No. 2: Symposium Issue: Civil Liberties in a Time of Terror.
• Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, Vol. 31, no. 1 (Fall 2002). Symposium:  Combating International Terrorism.
• Indiana Law Review, Vol. 36, no. 2 (2003). The Law and Economics of Providing Compensation for Harm Caused by Terrorism.
• Widener Law Symposium Journal, Vol. 9, no. 2003. Combating Terrorism in the Environmental Trenches.
• Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 35, no , 2002. Terrorism: The Legal Implications of the Response to September 11, 2001.
• Connecticut Insurance Law Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2002. Special Issue: September 11, 2001.
• University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 63, No. 4, 2002. Symposium Issue on Post-September 11 Legal Topics.
• William Mitchell Law Review, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2003. Justice in a Changed World.
• Michigan State University-Detroit College of Law Journal of International Law, Vol. 10, No. 3, Fall 2001. Terror Symposium: War on Terrorism and the Responses in the United States and Abroad.
• Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, Vol. 11, No. 2, Spring 2002. Focus on International Terrorism.
• Urban Lawyer, Vol. 34, No. 3, Summer 2002. Cities on the Front Line: The Aftermath of September 11.
• Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2002. Civil Liberties After September 11th: A Closer Look at Detention Powers.
• International Lawyer, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2002. Terrorism's Burden on Globalization.
• Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2002. Issues in Homeland Security and Information.
• DePaul Business Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, Spring 2002. Terrorism, Security, and Competition: The Future of the Airline Industry.
• Criminal Justice, Vol. 17, No. 2, Summer 2002. Justice in the Balance: The Aftermath of 9/11.
• Internet Reference Services Quarterly, Vol. 6, Nos. 3/4, 2002. Bioterrorism and Political Violence: Web Resources.
• Notre Dame Journal on Law, Ethics, and Public Policy, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2002. 09.11.01.
• Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 43, No. 1, Winter 2002. Focus: September 11, 2001--Legal Response to Terror.
• Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 25, No. 2, Spring 2002. Symposium issue on Law and the War on Terrorism.

top

Torts

• Tarun Mehta, "A Duty Breached? Can Aggrieved Citizens Sue the U.S. Government under the Federal Tort Claims Act for 9/11?" 6 Howard Scroll 51-87 (2004).
• A. David E. Balahadia, "Preparations for a Storm: A Proposal for Managing the Litigation Stemming from September 11th, 2001," 4 Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 61-86 (2003).
• John M. Barkett, "If Terror Reigns, Will Torts Follow?" 9 Widener Law Symposium Journal 485-543 (2003).
• Lisa Heinzerling, "Terrorism, Toxics, and Tort," 9 Widener Law Symposium Journal 545-48 (2003).
• Kenneth G. Kubes, "`United We Stand': Managing Choice-of-Law Problems in September-11-Based Toxic Torts Through Federal Substantive Mass-Tort Law," 77 Indiana Law Journal 825-72 (2002).

USA PATRIOT Act (arranged by article title)

• Patricia Mell, "Big Brother at the Door: Balancing National Security with Privacy under the USA PATRIOT Act," 80 Denver University Law Review 375-427 (2002).
• Eric J. Gouvin, "Bringing Out the Big Guns: The USA PATRIOT Act, Money Laundering, and the War on Terrorism," 55 Baylor Law Review 955-90 (2003).
• Joan M. O'Sullivan-Butler, "Combatting Money Laundering and International Terrorism: Does the USA PATRIOT Act Require the Judicial System to Abandon Fundamental Due Process in the Name of Homeland Security?" 16 St. Thomas Law Review 395-422 (2004).
• Ellen S. Podgor, "Computer Crimes and the USA PATRIOT Act," Criminal Justice, Summer 2002, at 60.
• Peter G. Madrinan, "Devil in the Details: Constitutional Problems Inherent in the Internet Surveillance Provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001," 64 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 783-834 (2003).
• John W. Whitehead & Steven H. Aden, "Forfeiting `Enduring Freedom' for `Homeland Security': A Constitutional Analysis of the USA PATRIOT Act and the Justice Department's Anti-Terrorism Initiatives. 51 American University Law Review 1081-1133 (2002).
• David Hardin, "The Fuss over Two Small Words: The Unconstitutionality of the USA PATRIOT Act Amendments to FISA under the Fourth Amendment," 71 George Washington Law Review 291-345 (2003).
• Jennifer C. Evans, "Hijacking Civil Liberties: The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001," 33 Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal 933-90 (2002).
• Sharon H. Rackow, "How the USA PATRIOT Act Will Permit Governmental Infringement Upon the Privacy of Americans in the Name of "Intelligence" Investigations," 150 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1651-96 (2002).
• Paul T. Jaeger, John Carlo Bertot & Charles R. McClure, "The Impact of the USA PATRIOT Act on the Collection and Analysis of Personal Information under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act," 20 Government Information Quarterly 295-314 (2003.
• Tracey Topper Gonzalez, "Individual Rights Versus Collective Security: Assessing the Constitutionality of the USA Patriot Act," 11 International & Comparative Law Review 75-113 (2003).
• Thomas P. Vartanian, Mark J. Dorsey & Christopher M. Salter, "Information Sharing under the USA PATRIOT Act," 119 Banking Law Journal 600-607 (2002).
• Orin S. Kerr, "Internet Surveillance Law after the US Patriot Act: The Big Brother That Isn't," 97 Northwestern University Law Review 607-73 (2003).
• Kathryn Lee Holloman, "The New Identity Crises: USA PATRIOT Act Customer Identification Programs and the Matricula Consular as Primary Identity Verification for Mexican Nationals," 7 North Carolina Banking Institute 125-54 (2003).
• Steven A.Osher, "Privacy, Computers and the Patriot Act: The Fourth Amendment Isn't Dead, But No One Will insure It," 54 Florida Law Review 521-42 (2002).
• Michael T. McCarthy, "Recent Development. USA PATRIOT Act." 39 Harvard Journal on Legislation 435-53 (2002).
• Panel Discussion: The USA-PATRIOT Act and the American Response to Terror: Can We Protect Civil Liberties after September 11? Moderator: Jeffrey Toobin; panelists: Congressman Barney Frank, Michael Chertoff, David Cole, Stuart Taylor, Jr. & Beth Wilkinson. 39 American Criminal Law Review 1501-33 (2002).
• Laurie Thomas Lee, "The USA PATRIOT Act and Telecommunications: Privacy under Attack," 29 Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal 371-403 (2003).
• Alicia L. Rause, "USA Patriot Act: Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Legislation in the U.S. and Europe since September 11^th," 11 International & Comparative Law Review 173-86 (2003).
• Lisa Finnegan Abdolian & Harold Takooshian, "The USA PATRIOT Act: Civil Liberties, the Media, and Public Opinion," 30 Fordham Urban Law Journal 1429-53 (2003).
• The USA PATRIOT Act: Privacy versus Security in a Post-9/11 World. North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation, Vol. 29, no. 4 (2004).
• Jeremy C. Smith, "The USA Patriot Act: Violating Reasonable Expectations of Privacy Protected by the Fourth Amendment Without Advancing National Security," 82 North Carolina Law Review 412-55 (2003).
• Natsu Taylor Saito, "Whose Liberty? Whose Security? The USA PATRIOT Act in the Context of COINTELPRO and the Unlawful Repression of Political Dissent," 81 Oregon Law Review 1051-1131 (2002).

Victims

• Karen Gross, "Portraits of Grief: A Focus on Survivors," 19 New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 261-82 (2003).
• Carlin Meyer, "Who Cares?: Reflections on Law, Loss and Family Values in the Wake of 9/11," 19 New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 283-93 (2003).
• Michele Landis Dauber, "The War of 1812, September 11th, and the Politics of Compensation," 53 DePaul Law Review 289-354 (2003).
• Robert S. Peck, "The Victim Compensation Fund: Born from a Unique Confluence of Events Not Likely to Be Duplicated," 53 DePaul Law Review 209-30 (2003).
• Kenneth P. Nolan & Jeanne M. O'Grady, "The Victim Compensation Fund--Looking a Gift Horse in the Mouth," 53 DePaul Law Review 231-50 (2003).
• Lawrence M. Friedman & Joseph Thompson, "Total Disaster and Total Justice: Responses to Man-Made Tragedy." 53 DePaul Law Review 251-87 (2003).
• Tom R. Tyler & Hulda Thorisdottir, "A Psychological Perspective on Compensation for Harm: Examining the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund," 53 DePaul Law Review 355-91 (2003).
• Stephan Landsman, "A Chance to Be Heard: Thoughts about Schedules, Caps, and Collateral Source Deductions in the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund," 53 DePaul Law Review 393-415 (2003).
• Deborah R. Hensler, "Money Talks: Searching for Justice Through Compensation for Personal Injury and Death," 53 DePaul Law Review 417-55 (2003).
• Elizabeth M. Schneider, "Grief, Procedure, and Justice: The September 11th Victim Compensation Fund," 53 DePaul Law Review 457-500 (2003).
• Anthony J. Sebok, "What's Law Got to Do With It? Designing Compensation Schemes in the Shadow of the Tort System," 53 DePaul Law Review 501-25 (2003).
• George L. Priest, "The Problematic Structure of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund," 53 DePaul Law Review 527-45 (2003).
• Robert A. Katz, "Too Much of a Good Thing: When Charitable Gifts Augment Victim Compensation," 53 DePaul Law Review 547-89 (2003).
• Kenneth S. Abraham & Kyle D. Logue, "The Genie and the Bottle: Collateral Sources under the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund," 53 DePaul Law Review 591-626 (2003).
• Janet Cooper Alexander, "Procedural Design and Terror Victim Compensation," 53 DePaul Law Review 627-718 (2003).
• Matthew Diller, "Tort and Social Welfare Principles in the Victim Compensation Fund," 53 DePaul Law Review 719-68 (2003).
• Robert L. Rabin, "The September 11th Victim Compensation Fund: A Circumscribed Response or an Auspicious Model?" 53 DePaul Law Review 769-803 (2003).
• Marshall S. Shapo, "Compensation for Terrorism: What We Are Learning," 53 DePaul Law Review 805-20 (2003).
• Alan B. Morrison, "Lessons to Be Learned: The Victim Compensation Fund," 53 DePaul Law Review 821-30 (2003).
• Joel B. Eisen, "The Trajectory of "Normal" after 9/11: Trauma, Recovery and Post-Traumatic Societal Adaptation," 14 Fordham Environmental Law Journal 499-561 (2003).
• Karen Gross, "Portraits of Grief:  A Focus on Survivors," 46 New York Law School Law Review 631-52 (2002-2003).
  Carlin Meyer, "Who Cares?  Reflection on Law, Loss and Family Values in the Wake of 9/11," 46 New York Law School  Law Review 653 (2002-2003).
• Kelly A. Atherton, "Compensating Victims under the "Terrorism-Exception" of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: A State-Sponsored Victim's Compensation Fund," 12 Willamette Journal of International Law & Dispute Resolution 158-77 (2004).
• Joe Ward, "The September 11th Victim Compensation Fund: The Answer to Victim Relief?" 4 Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 161-75 (2003).
• James P. Kreider & Brian J. Alexander, "September 11 Aftermath: A Perspective on the VCF and Litigation," 18 Air & Space Lawyer 1, 17-21 (Winter 2004).
• Erin G. Holt, "The September 11 Victim Compensation Fund: Legislative Justice Sui Generis," 59 New York University Annual Survey of American Law 513-62 (2004).
• Josh Romero, "A Victim's Eye View of the September 11the Victim Compensation Fund," 71 Defense Counsel Journal 64-70 (2004).
• Rebecca Blackmon Joyner, "An Old Law for a New World? Third-Party Liability for Terrorist Acts--from the Klan to Al Qaeda," 72 Fordham Law Review 427-476 (2003).
• Robert A. Katz, "A Pig in a Python: How the Charitable Response to September 11 Overwhelmed the Law of Disaster Relief," 36 Indiana Law Review 251-333 (2003).
• Marshall S. Shapo, "Compensation for Victims of Terror: A Specialized Jurisprudence of Injury," 36 Indiana Law Review 237-49 (2003).
• Linda S. Mullenix & Kristen B. Stewart, "The September 11th Victim Compensation Fund: Fund Approaches to Resolving Mass Tort Litigation," 9 Connecticut Insurance Law Journal 121-52 (2002).
• Larry S. Stewart, Daniel L. Cohen & Karen L. Marangi, "The September 11th Victim Compensation Fund: Past or Prologue?" 9 Connecticut Insurance Law Journal 153-78 (2002).
• Marshall S. Shapo, "Compensation for Victims of Terror: A Specialized Jurisprudence of Injury," 30 Hofstra Law Review 1245-60 (2002).
• Mark G. Maggio, "September 11th and the Crisis Response for the Federal Courts," 66 Federal Probation 11 (June 2002).
• Richard P. Campbell, "America Acts: Swift Legislative Responses to the September 11th Attacks; Congress Moved to Stabilize the Airline Industry, to Establish a Victim Compensation Fund, and to Strengthen Airport and Aircraft Security," 69 Defense Counsel Journal 139 (2002).
• Sean K. Mangan, "Compensation for `Certain' Victims of Terrorism under Section 2002 of the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000: Individual Payments at an Institutional Cost," 42 Virginia Journal of International Law 1037-73 (2002).
• Kellyanne Conway, "The Microeconomic Effects of the Terrorist Attacks on September 11: Americans Helping Americans," 16 Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy 101-17 (2002).
• Kent C. Krause & and John A. Swiger, "Analysis of the Department of Justice Regulations for the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund," 67 Journal of Air Law and Commerce 117-140 (2002).
• Raymond L. Mariani, "The September 11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001 and the Protection of the Airline Industry: A Bill for the American People," 67 Journal of Air Law and Commerce 141-186 (2002).

top